Marquee Background
Marquee Background

Offit Kurman Blogs

M&A Nuggets

M&A Nuggets: Working Capital Requirement: The Seller's Scourge?

November 4, 2024

By Glenn D. Solomon

M&A Nuggets: Working Capital Requirement: The Seller's Scourge?

One of the most befuddling concepts to a seller in a merger transaction is the working capital requirement. Buyers base their purchase price offers assuming that there will be a normal amount of working capital in the business at closing. To a seller, the concept of leaving any working capital in the business may seem illogical. As a result of these disparate views, an inordinate amount of time is devoted to negotiating the working capital requirement. However, the working capital process does not need to burden moving a deal forward,

            There are two key steps in the working capital process. The first step is to establish the target working capital that will be required at closing. The second step is to determine after closing whether the target amount of working capital was left. An important part of determining the target working capital is the definition of working capital itself.  In its most basic form, working capital equals current assets less current liabilities. However, sellers are often surprised when buyers propose to include in working capital certain current assets and current liabilities that the sellers have not historically included.  Here are two key takeaways to be mindful of when negotiating the definition of working capital:

  1. Purchasers prefer to base working capital on a strict GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) standard. Sellers, however, often maintain books and records at least in part on a basis other than strict GAAP. Sellers should therefore negotiate for certain of their historical methods of accounting to be utilized to determine working capital, even if at variance from GAAP.
  2. Although certain historical accounting practices may not be in accordance with GAAP, it is unusual for a seller’s financial statements to be totally divergent from GAAP, that is, many accounting practices will be in accordance with GAAP. There are, however,  different methods to account for certain items, all of which are consistent with GAAP. For example, GAAP recognizes several different methods to value inventory. For those items that it is agreed GAAP will apply to, sellers should insist that an agreement be made on which alternative allowed GAAP method is to be used.

The purpose of negotiating the finer details of the working capital target is to have a meeting of the minds between the buyer and the seller, the result of which is no adjustment, or a small adjustment, to the purchase price when actual closing working capital is compared to the target.

Categories: M&A Nuggets

Related People

Related Services

  • Posts
  • About
  • Subscribe

Firm Highlights

  • Events
    AIA Tri-State Conference
    Princeton will serve as the backdrop for three days of connection, learning, and design leadership. From keynotes to tours to the Tri-State Design Awards, this year’s conference is designed to go far beyond education sessions. Kick off the week with pre-conference intensives and individual state component Design Award celebrations, followed by three days of education, inspiration, networking, and design excellence at the 2026 AIA Tri-State Conference—featuring pre-conference intensives, three keynote speakers, 25 education sessions, curated tours, an expo, spec academies, and the AIA Tri-State Design Awards—bringing together architects and design professionals from New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania to connect, learn, and celebrate the best of the profession. G2. Designing Secure Practices: Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, Contractual Provisions, and Insurance Risks for Architects (4:00 PM - 5:30 PM) Architects and design professionals increasingly rely on cloud platforms, BIM software, and digital tools to manage sensitive data, creating cybersecurity and privacy risks. A single incident can trigger liability claims, regulatory obligations, reputational harm, and insurance challenges. Yet many firms underestimate how contracts, insurance, and internal practices intersect during a breach. This program offers legal and insurance perspectives on cyber risk in architecture, examining liability exposure, risky contract provisions, and mitigation strategies. A cyber insurance expert will explain policy responses, coverage gaps, coordination with professional liability, and best practices for aligning insurance with contractual risk and protecting firms from evolving cyber threats. Learning Objectives: Identify key cybersecurity and data privacy risks faced by architecture firms and explain how these risks can impact professional liability and project outcomes. Analyze common contractual provisions to determine which clauses may increase exposure to cyber incidents and propose strategies to mitigate these risks. Evaluate the scope and limitations of cyber insurance policies, including coordination with professional liability coverage, to determine how a policy would respond in a breach scenario. Develop actionable risk management strategies by integrating legal, contractual, and insurance considerations to protect sensitive client and project data.
  • Blog Posts
    Offit Kurman Represents 1Aardvark in Acquisition by CesiumAstro
    Offit Kurman is pleased to announce its representation of 1Aardvark, LLC, a Virginia-based company specializing in mission software, advanced algorithms, and systems engineering solutions supporting national defense programs, in its acquisition by CesiumAstro Inc., a global leader in advanced space communications and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) systems. The transaction was announced on August 18, 2026. The acquisition brings together 1Aardvark's deep expertise in mission-critical software and engineering with CesiumAstro's pioneering capabilities in space communications and ISR technologies. According to CesiumAstro, the transaction enhances its ability to deliver autonomous and resilient space systems for demanding operational environments. Offit Kurman advised 1Aardvark throughout the transaction, providing strategic legal counsel on corporate, transactional, and related matters to support the successful completion of the acquisition. Those participating in the engagement included Ryan Alexander, Gary Brackett, Robin Gilden, Pavan Mehrotra, Jim Arico, Debbie Petito, and Scott Tippett. “This transaction represents a significant milestone for 1Aardvark and our team. We are deeply grateful to Ryan Alexander and the professionals at Offit Kurman for their outstanding guidance and steadfast support throughout the acquisition process,” said Ryan Kenward, President of 1Aardvark.  “Their insight, judgment, and dedication to achieving our objectives played a critical role in bringing this transaction to a successful close. We thank them for being trusted advisors every step of the way.” The acquisition underscores continued investment and consolidation within the aerospace, defense technology, and national security sectors, where software-driven capabilities and resilient space infrastructure remain increasingly important. About 1Aardvark 1Aardvark is a Virginia-based engineering and technology company specializing in mission software, algorithms, and systems engineering solutions supporting national defense missions.