Marquee Background
Marquee Background

Offit Kurman Blogs

Estates and Trusts

Corporate Transparency Act Reporting for Covered Entities Owned by Trusts

August 12, 2024

By Danielle Friedman

Corporate Transparency Act Reporting for Covered Entities Owned by Trusts

We are now six months into the new compliance regime instituted by the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and practitioners should be aware of the reporting obligations to assist clients with required disclosures. This article limits its focus to trusts. Specifically, estate planners should be able to advise their clients as to which parties to a trust need to report under the CTA when a trust owns business interests.

Reporting Requirements

Effective January 1, 2024, the CTA requires that “reporting companies”[1] disclose to the US Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) certain information about the company including, but not limited to, its beneficial owners.

Trusts themselves generally are not considered reporting companies because the CTA only applies to entities created by filing an organizational document with a state authority such as a secretary of state; however, when a trust owns interests in a reporting company, all parties associated with the trust may be considered beneficial owners of the reporting company.

The CTA defines a beneficial owner as any individual who either: (1) exercises substantial control over a reporting company, or (2) owns or controls at least 25 percent of a reporting company’s ownership interests.[2]

Individuals can substantially control or own a reporting company through trust arrangements. Substantial control is broadly defined[3], and there is no limit to the number of individuals associated with a trust who may need to be reported for exercising substantial control, and thus considered a “beneficial owner.” Given the far-reaching meaning of substantial control, any number of individuals that may constitute a beneficial owner with respect to a trust, including the trustee, beneficiary, grantor, or other individuals such as trust protectors, distribution trustees or advisors, investment trustees or advisors, members of the trust protector committee, holders of a power of appointment, or other power holders, whether directly or indirectly through contracts, arrangements, understandings, relationships, or otherwise.

If a trust owns or controls at least 25 percent of a reporting company’s ownership interests or exercises substantial control over a reporting company, then the parties to the trust that meet the following conditions are considered beneficial owners and must provide beneficial ownership information to FinCEN: Any party to the trust who:

  • Has authority to vote 25 percent or more of the interests of the reporting company.
  • Has authority to dispose of trust assets.
  • Has authority to remove and replace trustees or direct investments.
  • Is the sole permissible recipient of trust income and principal.
  • Has the right to demand a distribution.
  • Has the right to withdraw substantially all of the trust assets.
  • Has the right to otherwise control the trust’s activities.
  • Has the right to revoke the trust or withdraw trust assets.
  • Has the right to swap assets with the trust and reacquire assets from the trust.

Once it is determined who is a beneficial owner, such parties must furnish to the reporting company their full legal name, date of birth, residential address, and an identification number from a driver’s license, passport, or other state-issued identification along with a copy of the identification document. Any time this information changes, the reporting must be updated.

Corporate Trustees

If the beneficial owner is a legal entity such as a corporate trustee, the reporting company should determine whether any of the corporate trustee’s individual beneficial owners indirectly own or control at least 25 percent of the ownership interests of the reporting company through their ownership interests in the corporate trustee.

The following examples are provided by FinCEN:

  • If an individual owns 60 percent of the corporate trustee of a trust, and that trust holds 50 percent of a reporting company’s ownership interests, then the individual owns or controls 30 percent (60 percent × 50 percent = 30 percent) of the reporting company’s ownership interests and is, therefore, a beneficial owner of the reporting company.
  • If the same trust only holds 30 percent of the reporting company’s ownership interests, the same individual corporate trustee owner only owns or controls 18 percent (60 percent × 30 percent = 18 percent) of the reporting company, and thus is not a beneficial owner of the reporting company by virtue of ownership or control of ownership interests.

The reporting company may, but is not required to, report the name of the corporate trustee in lieu of information about an individual beneficial owner only if all of the following three conditions are met:

  • The corporate trustee is an entity that is exempt from the reporting requirements;
  • The individual beneficial owner owns or controls at least 25 percent of ownership interests in the reporting company only by virtue of ownership interests in the corporate trustee; and
  • The individual beneficial owner does not exercise substantial control over the reporting company.

It may also be necessary to consider whether any owners of, or individuals employed or engaged by, the corporate trustee exercise substantial control over a reporting company. The factors for determining substantial control by an individual connected with a corporate trustee are the same as for any beneficial owner.

Exemptions from the Definition of Beneficial Owner

When any of the following individuals qualifies for an exception, the reporting company does not have to report that individual in its beneficial ownership information report to FinCEN.

  • Minors (Parent or legal guardian of the minor must report instead)
  • Nominees, intermediaries, custodians, or agents
  • Remainder beneficiaries (Once the individual inherits the interest, this exception no longer applies, and the individual may qualify as a beneficial owner)
  • Creditors

Penalties for Noncompliance

While attorneys and beneficial owners are not directly responsible for filing reports with FinCEN—the onus falls on the reporting company itself—attorneys should be prepared to advise their clients whether a trust falls within the purview of the CTA and which parties associated with a trust must provide beneficial ownership information. Penalties for failing to comply with the CTA may be steep.

Parties to a trust who are considered beneficial owners must provide the reporting company with complete and accurate beneficial ownership information. If an individual willfully fails to do so, an enforcement action may be brought against such party because someone who willfully causes a reporting company’s failure to submit complete or updated beneficial ownership information to FinCEN is in violation of the CTA.

Violations can result in fines of $500 per day, up to $10,000 (both adjusted for inflation), and imprisonment for up to two years.

Civil and criminal liability may be avoided if an individual who submitted an original, erroneous report did not knowingly submit inaccurate information and submits an updated report correcting the inaccurate information within ninety days.

Conclusion

The beneficial owner information reporting analysis is complex and must be done on a case-by-case basis. A practitioner must review the extensive CTA information published on FinCEN’s website. There is no doubt that clients with trusts and trust-owned businesses will have questions about CTA compliance.


Reprinted with permission from the Summer 2024 edition of The Pennsylvania Bar Association's Real Property, Probate & Trust Law Section newsletter. All rights reserved. Further duplication without permission is prohibited.


[1] Reporting companies—defined as any company with twenty or fewer employees formed by filing with the Secretary of State or equivalent official—created or registered prior to January 1, 2024, have until January 1, 2025 to file an initial report; reporting companies created or registered after January 1, 2024 and before January 1, 2025, will have ninety days after creation or registration to file a report. Entities created on or after January 1, 2025 will have 30 days to submit the reports to FinCEN. The CTA exempts around two dozen categories of entities, including companies that

  • are publicly-traded;
  •  have more than twenty full-time US employees;
  • filed a previous year’s tax return showing more than $5 million in gross receipts or sales;
  • have an operating presence at a physical US office location;
  • operate in a regulated industry, such as banking, utilities, or insurance, that already imposes similar reporting requirements; or
  • are subsidiaries of exempt organizations.

The exemptions, which generally include larger companies already subject to regulation, underline the primary purpose of the CTA: to combat money laundering and other illicit activities conducted via small, private, and anonymous shell companies.

[2] There are other nuances to this rule if no single owner owns more than 25%.

[3] An individual or trust exercises substantial control over a reporting company if the individual or trust meets any of four general criteria: (1) the individual is a senior officer; (2) the individual or trust has authority to appoint or remove certain officers or a majority of directors of the reporting company; (3) the individual or trust is an important decision-maker; or (4) the individual or trust has any other form of substantial control over the reporting company.

Categories: Estates and Trusts

Related People

Related Services

  • Posts
  • About
  • Subscribe

Firm Highlights

  • Events
    AIA Tri-State Conference
    Princeton will serve as the backdrop for three days of connection, learning, and design leadership. From keynotes to tours to the Tri-State Design Awards, this year’s conference is designed to go far beyond education sessions. Kick off the week with pre-conference intensives and individual state component Design Award celebrations, followed by three days of education, inspiration, networking, and design excellence at the 2026 AIA Tri-State Conference—featuring pre-conference intensives, three keynote speakers, 25 education sessions, curated tours, an expo, spec academies, and the AIA Tri-State Design Awards—bringing together architects and design professionals from New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania to connect, learn, and celebrate the best of the profession. G2. Designing Secure Practices: Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, Contractual Provisions, and Insurance Risks for Architects (4:00 PM - 5:30 PM) Architects and design professionals increasingly rely on cloud platforms, BIM software, and digital tools to manage sensitive data, creating cybersecurity and privacy risks. A single incident can trigger liability claims, regulatory obligations, reputational harm, and insurance challenges. Yet many firms underestimate how contracts, insurance, and internal practices intersect during a breach. This program offers legal and insurance perspectives on cyber risk in architecture, examining liability exposure, risky contract provisions, and mitigation strategies. A cyber insurance expert will explain policy responses, coverage gaps, coordination with professional liability, and best practices for aligning insurance with contractual risk and protecting firms from evolving cyber threats. Learning Objectives: Identify key cybersecurity and data privacy risks faced by architecture firms and explain how these risks can impact professional liability and project outcomes. Analyze common contractual provisions to determine which clauses may increase exposure to cyber incidents and propose strategies to mitigate these risks. Evaluate the scope and limitations of cyber insurance policies, including coordination with professional liability coverage, to determine how a policy would respond in a breach scenario. Develop actionable risk management strategies by integrating legal, contractual, and insurance considerations to protect sensitive client and project data.
  • Blog Posts
    Law, Love, and Life's Battles: Facing Breast Cancer
    What happens to a marriage and a family when a breast cancer diagnosis changes everything? In this episode of Love Ends, Law Begins, hosts Fara Rodriguez and Stephanie Lehman have a deeply personal conversation about breast cancer, marriage, family, and the challenges that can come with a serious illness. This episode is especially meaningful for Fara, who shares her own recent breast cancer diagnosis and journey. She opens up about discovering a lump, receiving her diagnosis, undergoing a double mastectomy and subsequent treatments, and navigating the emotional impact of cancer while continuing to work and care for her family. Fara and Stephanie discuss how a cancer diagnosis can affect a marriage in unexpected ways—from changing family roles and creating new caregiving responsibilities to putting pressure on finances, health insurance, and household responsibilities. They explore how illness can either bring couples closer together or create additional challenges, particularly when one spouse becomes the primary caregiver or when the family is dealing with fear and uncertainty. The conversation also addresses the unique challenges of parenting during an illness, including how to talk to children about a cancer diagnosis and how divorced parents may need to adjust parenting schedules and responsibilities when one parent becomes sick. From navigating medical expenses and insurance coverage to balancing work, parenting, caregiving, and intimacy, Fara and Stephanie offer a candid look at the ways illness can reshape relationships and family dynamics. In recognition of Breast Cancer Awareness Month, this episode provides an honest and personal conversation about facing cancer while navigating marriage, family, and the many practical challenges that come with a serious diagnosis. In this episode, you'll hear about: • Fara's personal breast cancer diagnosis and journey • How a cancer diagnosis can affect a marriage • The challenges of becoming a caregiver to your spouse • How illness can bring couples closer together—or create new challenges • Talking to children about a parent's cancer diagnosis • How divorced parents can navigate parenting responsibilities when one parent becomes ill • The financial impact of illness and the loss of household income • Health insurance and medical coverage considerations • How medical expenses can create additional financial strain • The importance of support from family, friends, and caregivers • Balancing work, parenting, treatment, and recovery • How illness can affect intimacy and marital dynamics • The importance of supporting children through a parent's illness • Why communication and cooperation matter during a health crisis • Breast Cancer Awareness Month and the importance of mammograms