Legal Blog
Saturday Side Hustle: Who Owns the Music? The Taylor Swift Effect
The key concept here is that if you created a musical composition, you own it, but how you share the wealth in terms of commercial exploitation if up to you; but you may be in a position of weakness when it comes to negotiating with a label or a producer. If you can, you may want to consider providing that any sound recording is a work made for hire, and the copyright is ultimately owned by you. If the producer is not your employee, this has to be done using a contract. Most artists, however, don’t like dealing with contracts and may not have the resources to hire an attorney to handle this process, which can lead to inadvertent loss of copyrights or at least overly restrictive terms that handcuff the artist for a period of time.
Taylor Swift provides us with an illustrative example of this. I covered this in a podcast last year. She recorded six albums and gave up the rights in the sound recordings to a label, which ultimately landed the rights in the sound recordings in the hands of an overseas investment firm. She didn’t like this outcome. However, she writes her own songs and was able to obtain a contractual provision that allowed here to record her first six albums again after a period of time expired. Because she had disdain for certain individuals involved with her former record label, she began rerecording these albums in order to create competition with them.
This has the effect of creating a bidding war for the use of her music. For example, if I want to license the right to use one of her songs in connection with a scene in a TV show, I might have the option of going to the owner of her original recordings and Taylor herself, as the owner of the new versions. They can then lowball each other, and I can pick the lower-cost option.
For more information on this topic, please contact Scott Lloyd at slloyd@offitkurman.com.
ABOUT SCOTT LLOYD
Scott Lloyd is a registered patent attorney who specializes in intellectual property counseling and commercialization work. He has served as a technology commercialization specialist and advisor to companies in a diverse array of markets, including biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, food and beverage, specialty chemicals, technology, and engineering. In addition, Mr. Lloyd spent ten years as in-house general counsel to small and mid-sized companies, where he managed corporate matters and resolved commercial disputes in addition to intellectual property strategy, and now serves in the same capacity for entrepreneurial clients. He serves as counsel to small and mid-sized business owners seeking to implement growth strategies and succession plans.
While in house, Mr. Lloyd has also contributed to the successful formation of international affiliates of domestic businesses as well as a $400,000,000 business acquisition.
ABOUT OFFIT KURMAN
Offit Kurman, one of the fastest-growing, full-service law firms in the United States, serves dynamic businesses, individuals and families. With 17 offices and nearly 250 lawyers who counsel clients across more than 30 areas of practice, Offit Kurman helps maximize and protect business value and personal wealth by providing innovative and entrepreneurial counsel that focuses on clients’ business objectives, interests and goals. The firm is distinguished by the quality, breadth and global reach of its legal services and a unique operational structure that encourages a culture of collaboration. For more information, visit www.offitkurman.com.
DELAWARE | MARYLAND | NEW JERSEY | NEW YORK | NORTH CAROLINA | PENNSYLVANIA |SOUTH CAROLINA | VIRGINIA | WASHINGTON, DC