Marquee Background
Marquee Background

Offit Kurman Blogs

The Weekly Scenario

The Weekly Scenario: Required Minimum Distribution (“RMD”) under the SECURE Act

May 6, 2021

By Steven E. Shane

Is there a year of death for Required Minimum Distribution (“RMD”) under the SECURE Act?

Even over a year in the passage of the SECURE Act, many questions remain about the correct way to handle the RMD in the year of death.

The RMD for the year of death will only need to be taken if the IRA owner died on or after their required beginning date (RBD) and had not already taken all of their RMD.  Under the new rules of the SECURE Act, the RBD is now April 1 of the year following the year the IRA owner reaches age 72. Note that all Roth IRA owners are considered to have died before their RBD. This means that there is never a year-of-death RMD required from a Roth IRA. Nothing needs to be withdrawn in the year of death.

Example 1:  Jane’s 72nd birthday is November 21, 2021. She died in December of 2021 without taking her 2021 RMD. Jane died before her RBD (April 1, 2022). Therefore, no RMD is required for the year of her death (2021).

The RMD for the year of death is calculated as if the IRA owner had lived for that year.  This means it will be calculated using the Uniform Lifetime Table. The requirement that a year-of-death RMD be taken is unaffected by the SECURE Act. This is because the changes made in the SECURE Act to the calculation of RMDs deal only with post-death RMDs. The amount of the year-of-death RMD is based on the IRA owner’s pre-death lifetime payments.

Example 2:  Dave, age 75, dies in 2021. The year-of-death RMD that must be taken from his IRA will still be calculated using the factor that corresponds to his age 75 on the Uniform Lifetime Table (22.9).

If the year-of-death RMD was not already taken by the IRA owner, it must be taken by the beneficiary. It is not paid to the IRA owner’s estate (unless the estate is named as the beneficiary). The beneficiary will also pay the tax on the distribution.

The SECURE Act’s requirement that non-spouse beneficiaries use the 10-year rule does NOT remove the beneficiary’s responsibility to take the year-of-death RMD.

Example 3: Sam died in 2021 at age 81. He named his nephew Joey as his IRA beneficiary. However, Sam did not take his RMD prior to his death. Joey is a non-eligible designated beneficiary and is subject to the 10-year payout term.  Joey is responsible for taking his uncle’s year-of-death RMD prior to the end of 2021.

As always, if you have any questions or would like to learn more, please contact Steve Shane at sshane@offitkurman.com or 301.575.0313.

Categories: The Weekly Scenario

Related People

Related Services

  • Posts
  • About
  • Subscribe

Firm Highlights

  • Blog Posts
    Prenups: The Marriage Contract You Need to Talk About Before Saying “I Do”
    What if talking about a prenup isn't about planning for divorce, but about having honest conversations before you get married? In this episode of Love Ends, Law Begins, hosts Fara Rodriguez and Stephanie Lehman take a closer look at one of the most misunderstood legal documents in marriage: the prenuptial agreement. They discuss why prenups are becoming more common, what couples should consider when creating one, and some of the unusual clauses people have tried to include. From infidelity and social media clauses to financial arrangements and “walk away” agreements, the conversation explores how prenups can be tailored to a couple's individual circumstances. Fara and Stephanie also discuss the importance of thinking beyond the present and considering how marriage, children, careers, finances, and even moving to another state could affect a prenup in the future. They explain why couples need to understand what they're agreeing to, especially when one spouse may eventually become a stay at home parent or sacrifice their own earning potential. Whether you're engaged, considering a prenup, or simply curious about how these agreements work, this conversation offers a practical look at the financial and legal conversations couples should have before walking down the aisle. In this episode, you'll hear about: • Why couples choose to create prenuptial agreements • What a “walk away” agreement means • How marriage can change the way couples approach finances • What happens when one spouse becomes a stay at home parent • Lifestyle, infidelity, and social media clauses • Why child custody and child support can't be predetermined in a prenup • The importance of financial transparency before marriage • How future careers, children, and relocation can impact a prenup • Why state laws matter when couples move after signing an agreement • How a prenup can serve as a roadmap for dividing assets if a marriage ends
  • Events
    AIA Tri-State Conference
    Princeton will serve as the backdrop for three days of connection, learning, and design leadership. From keynotes to tours to the Tri-State Design Awards, this year’s conference is designed to go far beyond education sessions. Kick off the week with pre-conference intensives and individual state component Design Award celebrations, followed by three days of education, inspiration, networking, and design excellence at the 2026 AIA Tri-State Conference—featuring pre-conference intensives, three keynote speakers, 25 education sessions, curated tours, an expo, spec academies, and the AIA Tri-State Design Awards—bringing together architects and design professionals from New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania to connect, learn, and celebrate the best of the profession. G2. Designing Secure Practices: Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, Contractual Provisions, and Insurance Risks for Architects (4:00 PM - 5:30 PM) Architects and design professionals increasingly rely on cloud platforms, BIM software, and digital tools to manage sensitive data, creating cybersecurity and privacy risks. A single incident can trigger liability claims, regulatory obligations, reputational harm, and insurance challenges. Yet many firms underestimate how contracts, insurance, and internal practices intersect during a breach. This program offers legal and insurance perspectives on cyber risk in architecture, examining liability exposure, risky contract provisions, and mitigation strategies. A cyber insurance expert will explain policy responses, coverage gaps, coordination with professional liability, and best practices for aligning insurance with contractual risk and protecting firms from evolving cyber threats. Learning Objectives: Identify key cybersecurity and data privacy risks faced by architecture firms and explain how these risks can impact professional liability and project outcomes. Analyze common contractual provisions to determine which clauses may increase exposure to cyber incidents and propose strategies to mitigate these risks. Evaluate the scope and limitations of cyber insurance policies, including coordination with professional liability coverage, to determine how a policy would respond in a breach scenario. Develop actionable risk management strategies by integrating legal, contractual, and insurance considerations to protect sensitive client and project data.