They show us where we are, get us where we need to go, and prevent us from losing our way. It is hard to imagine modern life without Global Positioning System (GPS) devices. Indeed, many people not only have navigational systems installed in their cars but carry GPS around all day within their phones.
As helpful and ubiquitous as the technology is, however, GPS raises complex uncertainties around privacy. Should GPS providers such as Apple and Google be allowed to retain user location data? If so, what kinds of data, and for how long? Can companies share that information? What about law enforcement—can agencies use GPS to track their suspects?
Then there are concerns about individuals involved in separations, divorces, and other family law disputes. For instance: What rights does someone have to defend themselves against an ex-spouse using GPS to spy on their movements? Is information that device collects admissible in court?
These were precisely the questions facing the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), and Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018). In the first case, the Supreme Court ruled that a GPS tracing device counts as a “search” under the Fourth Amendment, meaning that data must be collected under a search warrant to be admissible. In the second case, the Supreme Court clarified that the same rules apply to not just GPS data, but all phone data.
To learn more, read “Admissibility of GPS Surveillance Data in Civil Cases” at the National Legal Research Group’s Family Law Research Blog.
With the emergence of any new technology come new developments in all corners of the law. Family law is no exception. To stay ahead of any legal updates that may affect you and your family, be sure to subscribe to the Offit Kurman blog.
