Intellectual Property

A Checklist for University Policies Addressing Student-Athlete Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) Issues

September 13, 2021

By W. Drew Kastner and Stephenie Wingyuen Yeung 楊穎苑

In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Alston v. NCAA, the National Collegiate Athletic Association ("NCAA") issued an interim policy announcing that it will no longer enforce its rules prohibiting compensation for the use of a student-athlete's name, image and likeness ("NIL"). Other athletic associations have like-wise amended their bylaws to allow student-athletes to profit from the use of their NIL. Additionally, new laws recently enacted by many states, such as Pennsylvania, now require institutions of higher education to publish policies on these issues.

To comply with NCAA rules and state law, universities face a range of somewhat complex considerations in forming and implementing NIL policies and procedures. Here are some of the key issues in the form of a practical checklist:

  1. Know the NCAA policy or the policy of the athletic association that governs your institution's teams.

The NCAA has a Division Manual for each of its three divisions. The Manuals are several hundred pages long and include at least several dozen policies that address issues that may be impacted by NIL activity. These manuals and policies have not yet been revised. Instead, the NCAA's interim policy states simply:

"Individuals can engage in NIL activities that are consistent with the law of the state where the school is located. Colleges and universities may be a resource for state law questions.

Individuals can use a professional services provider for NIL activities.

College athletes who attend a school in a state without a NIL law can engage in NIL activity without violating NCAA rules related to name, image, and likeness.

State law and schools/conferences may impose reporting requirements."

https://www.ncaa.org/about/taking-action

  1. Know what hasn't changed in the NCAA manuals.
  • Subject to state law, the NCAA still prohibits a "NIL agreement without quid pro quo (e.g., compensation for work not performed)."
  • Subject to state law, the NCAA prohibits "NIL compensation contingent upon enrollment at a particular school."
  • Subject to state law, the NCAA still prohibits "compensation for athletic participation or achievement. Athletic performance may enhance a student-athlete's NIL value, but athletic performance may not be the 'consideration' for NIL compensation."
  • Subject to state law, the NCAA still prohibits "institutions providing compensation in exchange for the use of a student-athlete's name, image or likeness."

https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/ncaa/NIL/NIL_QandA.pdf (See Q. 11)

  1. Know your state's NIL law.

A majority of states have enacted brand-new NIL laws, and the requirements vary considerably. Some states even require that institutions create funds from ticket sales or other promotional activities to benefit athletes. Pennsylvania's new law contains many provisions similar to those in other states. For example:

  • Pennsylvania's law applies to institutions within Pennsylvania and to students participating in intercollegiate athletics at those institutions. The laws of other states may also apply to their residents regardless of where they attend school. 24 P.S. §20-2001k, et seq.
  • Pennsylvania's law permits college athletes to earn compensation for the use of the athlete's NIL and provides that the compensation must be commensurate with the market value of the athlete's NIL.
  • Pennsylvania's law prohibits college athletes from accepting compensation in exchange for their attendance, participation, or performance at the institution ("pay-for-play").
  • Pennsylvania's law prohibits college athletes from earning compensation for NIL use "in connection with a person, company or organization related to or associated with the development, production, distribution, wholesaling or retailing" of the following:
  • Adult entertainment products and services.
  • Alcohol products.
  • Casinos and gambling, including sports betting, the lottery, and betting in connection with video games, online games, and mobile devices.
  • Tobacco and electronic smoking products and devices.
  • Prescription pharmaceuticals.
  • A controlled, dangerous substance.
  • Other products or activities prohibited by the institution.
  • Pennsylvania's law also permits institutions to prohibit student NIL use more broadly: (i) in activities that conflict with existing institutional sponsorship arrangements and (ii) based on other considerations that conflict with institutional values, as defined by the institution. The Pennsylvania law requires institutions to have policies that "specify the name, image or like-ness activities [in] which the college student may not engage."
  • Pennsylvania's law requires students to disclose proposed NIL contracts to a designated official of the institution at least seven days before the execution of the contract.
  • Pennsylvania's law prohibits institutions (i) from preventing student-athletes from earning compensation through the use of the student's NIL or (ii) from obtaining professional representation in relation to NIL use.
  • Pennsylvania's law prohibits institutions from arranging third-party compensation for a student-athlete relating to NIL use as an inducement to recruit prospective students.
  • Pennsylvania's law requires any person producing a college team jersey, video game, or trading card for profit to make a royalty payment to each athlete whose NIL or "other individually identifiable feature" is used.
  • Pennsylvania's law does not require institutions to facilitate or enable NIL opportunities for athletes. The law specifically states that it does not require an institution to permit athletes to use the institution's marks, logos, mascots, or other intellectual property.
  1. Know your state's student-athlete agency law. Many states, including Pennsylvania, require registration, which may include payment of fees and posting of bonds. See, e.g., 5 Pa.C.S. §3301 et seq.
  2. Tell the students where to find a list of "banned products." Pennsylvania's law requires that institutions disclose to students the types of deals that the institution prohibits. Therefore, institutional policies should let students know which products and activities are prohibited by state law and by institutional decree. For example, should student-athletes be permitted to engage in NIL activity for CBD and hemp products? Nutritional supplements? Guns? Professional sports teams? Gambling? Broadcasters? Can they contract with university entities, such as a meal service? Institutional policies should also specify products that conflict with school contracts, such as institutional sponsorship deals that include exclusivity promises. Policies should let students know whether all teams have a conflict or just certain teams.
  3. Is certain activity prohibited on social media?
  4. Tell students whether and how they can use the school's copyright materials (including game footage, logos, nicknames, mascots, etc.), and if appropriate, how to get permission to do so. Consider requiring all vendors, whether involved through the student NIL process or otherwise, to seek approval in the same way for the use of school marks.
  5. Tell students whether they can use the school's facilities and fields for NIL purposes, and if so, how to get permission to do so.
  6. Tell students whether NIL activity can interfere with class time or team activities.
  7. Warn students of other potential hazards, including:
  • The need to consult with the designated school official for international students (because many students are in the United States on visas that prohibit employment), and
  • The need to consult with the financial aid office (because a successful NIL venture may result in income, which may need to be included in determining income-based financial aid eligibility and awards).
  • Indeed, before rolling out an NIL policy, it might be a good idea to coordinate with the university's financial aid office and international student office.
  1. Require disclosure of student-athlete NIL contracts. Pennsylvania law requires disclosure to the institution of all NIL contracts at least seven days prior to the execution of the contract. In other states, some institutions are establishing dollar amount thresholds. Your policy should clarify what happens in the event the institution is unable to respond in a timely manner. Does a failure to respond mean that the student has the institution's approval to proceed?

Create a formal process for disclosure of NIL deals by student-athletes and review by the school. Many schools may find it helpful to designate an NIL coordinator.

  1. Consider requiring all agents representing student-athletes for NIL activities to register with your school and to provide basic information. Consider advising students of the need to comply with NCAA rules regarding agents, including that students "shall be ineligible… if the individual enters into an oral or written agreement with an agent for representation in future professional sports negotiations that are to take place after the individual has completed eligibility in that sport." NCAA Manual, Div. 1, 2021-22, bylaw 12.3.1.3.
  2. Consider providing education to students about (a) the NIL and agent registration laws, (b) protecting intellectual property, (c) financial acumen, and (d) university policies and procedures.
  3. Consider an internal appeal process or grievance process for NIL issues.
  4. Consider other policies and documents that may require review and revision:
  5. School contracts containing licensing provisions. Will the school be responsible for student NIL disputes with a university vendor?
  6. Insurance policies. Will the university's insurance respond if there are disputes?
  7. Social media policies.
  8. Student forms granting the university permission to use the student's NIL in connection with university promotional activity.
  9. Student discipline policies which may need to specifically identify the types of discipline that may be assessed on students who violate NIL rules.
  10. Student grievance policies. Do existing policies allow students to file complaints if the institution prohibits a proposed NIL contract or fails to respond to a proposed contract?

Takeaways. Institutions of higher education must create policies to inform student-athletes of their rights and responsibilities and consider updating related rules across the full range of inter-connected issues within the institution. Institutions must be prepared to make further updates as additional guidance becomes available and as rules change.

Firm Highlights

  • Podcasts
    The College Prep Most Parents Skip with Candace Dellacona and Kimberly Lau
    When the "Cornell 7" case made national headlines this fall, many parents found themselves asking a question they never expected to face: what actually happens when something goes wrong on campus? We spend so much time preparing our kids to get into college and succeed once they get there, but how often do we prepare them for what happens next if a report is made, by them or about them? In this episode of The Sandwich Generation Survival Guide, host Candace Dellacona is joined by her colleague Kimberly Lau, who represents both complainants and respondents in Title IX matters such as the case capturing the latest headlines. Together, they break down what Title IX is, who it protects, what happens when a college receives a report, and what students and parents should know before their child ever needs it. Kimberly explains why Title IX reaches far beyond athletics, what it generally means when a student is contacted by the campus Title IX office, and what a family should do first, whether their child is reporting something that happened to them, is the subject of a complaint, or simply got caught up in a situation they never expected. She also walks through how privacy rules affect what a school can share with parents, who can sit in on meetings, how investigations, hearings, and decisions typically unfold, and why preserving evidence and knowing your school's policies early can make all the difference. Whatever the outcome of the case making headlines, it has put a spotlight on how campus processes work, and on how much families often don't know until they're in the middle of one. If you are sending a freshman off to campus, welcoming a student home for the holidays, or simply want to be the kind of parent your child feels safe calling when things go wrong, this conversation offers clear, practical guidance you can use now. As Candace puts it, calling home right away is not a sign that your child has failed at being an adult. It is knowing where to turn. This episode is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Every situation is different, so please consult an attorney about your specific circumstances. Learn more about Kimberly Lau and her practice at Offit Kurman: https://www.offitkurman.com/kimberly-lau Connect with Kimberly on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kimberlylauesq/ Follow and subscribe to The Sandwich Generation Survival Guide wherever you listen to podcasts. New conversations are released on the first and third Tuesdays of every month. If this episode resonates with you, leave a five-star rating or review and share it with another sandwich generation caregiver!
  • Blog Posts
    Powering the Future Maximizing Energy Storage Value with David Braun
    In this episode of the MSSIA Insight Podcast, host Matthew Karmel, Chair of Offit Kurman’s Environmental & Sustainability Practice, sits down with David Braun, Chief Commercial Officer at Intelligent Generation, to explore how distributed energy storage is creating new opportunities for businesses, developers, and the broader energy grid.With more than 35 years of experience in the energy and utility sector, David shares how battery storage can help commercial and industrial customers earn revenue, reduce energy costs, and improve power reliability. The conversation explores revenue stacking, including how batteries can generate value through wholesale energy markets, reduce capacity and transmission charges, store excess solar energy, and provide backup power during outages or disruptions.Matthew and David also discuss the evolving energy storage landscape across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, highlighting differences in state policies, utility programs, and opportunities for virtual power plants. David explains how industry collaboration through MSSIA can help advance effective energy policies and accelerate project development.Looking ahead, David shares his perspective on the future of distributed energy storage, the transition toward a more interconnected and resilient grid, and the importance of accurately modeling battery economics to demonstrate project value and support investment decisions. In this episode, you’ll learn about: How battery storage can help businesses earn revenue, save money, and protect operations. What revenue stacking means and how multiple battery applications create economic value. How rising capacity and transmission charges are influencing energy storage opportunities in PJM. The differences in energy storage policies and incentives across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware. The role of virtual power plants in supporting grid reliability and managing energy demand. Why accurate financial modeling, customer load profiles, and utility rate structures are critical to evaluating battery projects. How MSSIA supports industry collaboration and policy advocacy across the Mid-Atlantic. Whether you're a solar or storage developer, investor, contractor, attorney, or clean energy professional, this episode offers practical insights into the economics, policy considerations, and emerging opportunities shaping the distributed energy storage market. About the MSSIA Insight Podcast Powered by Offit Kurman and presented in partnership with the Mid-Atlantic Solar & Storage Industries Association (MSSIA), the MSSIA Insight Podcast explores the legal, regulatory, and business developments shaping the solar and energy storage industries across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware. Hosted by Matthew Karmel, the podcast features conversations with industry leaders and subject matter experts, delivering actionable insights to help clean energy professionals navigate an evolving industry. New episodes are released every other month.   Join our next policy committee call as a guest to see firsthand the impact we're driving: https://forms.gle/8WqmDvdJUKBh35Qw7
  • Events
    The 2026 Economic, Tax, and Accounting Updates
    We are looking forward to the Mid-Atlantic CFO Roundtable's next event on November 13, 2026. This is a program with topics built for Finance Executives. We are extremely fortunate to have three excellent speakers: Dr. Daraius Irani, Vice President of Business and Public Engagement at Towson University; Mike Stankus, Tax Office Managing Principal at BDO; and Daniel Wahlberg, Managing Partner of Acclare Solutions. The economy is rapidly changing with various factors driving it. The November 3rd midterm elections may also have an impact. Our three expert presenters will discuss the ramifications of the election, and the current year updates to GAAP financial reporting and Federal and State income taxes. Please join us for what will surely be an informative and timely discussion. Meet Our Speakers: Daraius Irani, Ph.D. • Towson University Vice President, Business & Public Engagement Dr. Daraius Irani serves as Vice President of Business and Public Engagement at Towson University as well as the chief economist for the Regional Economic Studies Institute (RESI) at Towson University, a policy group providing economic, fiscal impact, and policy analysis to public and private entities.  Dr. Irani is often called upon to provide economic presentations to organizations across Maryland. He has appeared on numerous television programs and in local and regional print media. Dr. Irani holds a Ph.D. in economics from University of California, Santa Barbara. Dan Wahlberg • Acclare Solutions Managing Partner With over 28 years of experience, Dan Wahlberg is a recognized leader in audit and assurance for the Mid-Atlantic’s middle market business community. As a licensed CPA in Maryland and Virginia, Dan has led assurance practices at top regional firms, including serving as Baltimore Audit Managing Partner and Assurance Practice Leader at BDO USA in Baltimore and as Partner and member of the Management Committee at Hertzbach & Company P.A which merged into BDO in 2020. His expertise centers on delivering clarity, strategic guidance, and proactive solutions to middle-market businesses across Baltimore and beyond. His entrepreneurial spirit has led him to begin a new CPA firm this year with four other CPAs serving the business community. Dan holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Rutgers University and began his career at PWC in New York. He is also deeply engaged in the community, previously serving as President of ACG Maryland and current Board member and as Audit Committee Member for The Associated: Jewish Federation of Baltimore.  Mike Stankus • BDO USA LLP Tax Office Managing Principal Mike Stankus is the Tax Office Managing Principal for the firm’s Baltimore office. He has more than 16 years of experience providing tax planning and preparation and management advisory services for his clients. Mike focuses on advising privately held businesses and their owners on effective growth and tax strategies. He also performs various engagements for mergers and acquisitions and complex cost accounting projects and projections. In addition, he represents various government contracting clients before the DCAA and assists with FAR compliance. Mike’s areas of concentration include working with government contractors, professional service firms, construction companies, and homebuilders.
  • Events
    AIA Tri-State Conference
    Princeton will serve as the backdrop for three days of connection, learning, and design leadership. From keynotes to tours to the Tri-State Design Awards, this year’s conference is designed to go far beyond education sessions. Kick off the week with pre-conference intensives and individual state component Design Award celebrations, followed by three days of education, inspiration, networking, and design excellence at the 2026 AIA Tri-State Conference—featuring pre-conference intensives, three keynote speakers, 25 education sessions, curated tours, an expo, spec academies, and the AIA Tri-State Design Awards—bringing together architects and design professionals from New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania to connect, learn, and celebrate the best of the profession. G2. Designing Secure Practices: Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, Contractual Provisions, and Insurance Risks for Architects (4:00 PM - 5:30 PM) Architects and design professionals increasingly rely on cloud platforms, BIM software, and digital tools to manage sensitive data, creating cybersecurity and privacy risks. A single incident can trigger liability claims, regulatory obligations, reputational harm, and insurance challenges. Yet many firms underestimate how contracts, insurance, and internal practices intersect during a breach. This program offers legal and insurance perspectives on cyber risk in architecture, examining liability exposure, risky contract provisions, and mitigation strategies. A cyber insurance expert will explain policy responses, coverage gaps, coordination with professional liability, and best practices for aligning insurance with contractual risk and protecting firms from evolving cyber threats. Learning Objectives: Identify key cybersecurity and data privacy risks faced by architecture firms and explain how these risks can impact professional liability and project outcomes. Analyze common contractual provisions to determine which clauses may increase exposure to cyber incidents and propose strategies to mitigate these risks. Evaluate the scope and limitations of cyber insurance policies, including coordination with professional liability coverage, to determine how a policy would respond in a breach scenario. Develop actionable risk management strategies by integrating legal, contractual, and insurance considerations to protect sensitive client and project data.