Marquee Background
Marquee Background

Offit Kurman Blogs

Healthcare

Legal Compliance Issues For Diagnostic Testing Centers

October 15, 2021

By Michael H. Cohen

Diagnostic testing is the lifeblood of the medical profession. Doctors and hospitals constantly refer patients for various types of bodily fluid, imaging, genetic, and other tests. Tests are usually performed at diagnostic centers that are located separately from the physician’s office. Most hospitals have their own diagnostic centers but hospitals may also refer some patients to separate facilities too.

Diagnostic tests are usually ordered for purposes of screening, to diagnose whether a patient has a disorder, to evaluate how severe a disorder is, and to monitor how well (or poorly) the patient is responding to treatment. Many disorders are treated after the diagnostic test but some, such as colonoscopies, are treated contemporaneously with the test.

Physicians and diagnostic centers should speak with an experienced healthcare lawyer before starting any practice and before developing any new business relationship. There are numerous federal and state laws that regulate medical practices and services.

What are the common types of diagnostic tests?

Diagnostic tests include:

  • Bodily fluid analysis. These tests include blood tests, urine tests, tests for the fluid that surrounds the spinal cord and brain, and synovial fluid (joint) tests. Physicians may also order tests for saliva, sweat, and gastric tract liquids.
  • Imaging tests. These tests take take pictures of parts of the body. Common diagnostic imaging tests include:
    • X-rays.
    • CT scans (computed tomography)
    • MRIs (magnetic resonance imaging)
    • Other imaging tests such as “ultrasonography, radioisotope (nuclear) scanning, positron emission tomography (PET), and angiography.”
  • This test uses a viewing tube to observe body organs and cavities. The end of the endoscope has a camera and light so the physician can observe through a monitor. Tools can be passed through an endoscope channel. An endoscopy is used to examine, among other organs – the nose, mouth, respiratory tracts, colon, bladder, and uterus. Sometimes the physician needs to create incisions to use the endoscope.
  • Measuring bodily functions. Common examples include examining the electrical activity of the heart – an electrocardiography (ECG) and the brain – electroencephalography (EEG).
  • This test examined tissues simples that are moved and then examined with a microscope. The physician or medical examiner is usually looking for abnormal cells that may show disorders such as cancer.
  • Genetic testing. This type of testing generally involves examining cells (from a patient’s blood, skin, or bone marrow) to check for chromosome abnormalities and gene (including DNA) abnormalities. Genetic testing involves testing a fetus for a genetic disorder and children/adults for whether they are at risk for a disorder, and adults.

There are some risks with every test. Test results are normally based on the average values within a healthy population.

Physician supervision of diagnostic tests

Medicare has different rules and regulations for different types of diagnostic tests. An experienced healthcare lawyer can explain how Medicare monitors and regulates various tests. One of the most common types of tests are imaging tests. The Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS) generally uses the standards set by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JACAHO) for inpatient diagnostic imaging standards.

The CMS requires that physicians must supervise imaging tests for outpatient diagnostic services. According to AAPC, only “a doctor of medicine or osteopathy legally authorized to practice medicine in his or her state of practice, as defined by §1861(r) of the Social Security Act,” may act as a supervisory physician. Generally, the following people do not qualify as a “physician” and cannot act in a supervisory physician capacity – for purposes of diagnostic tests:

  • Nurses
  • Physician assistants
  • Clinical nurse specialists
  • Certified nurse midwives

There are also rules that your healthcare compliance lawyer can explain about – if and when a radiologist can order his/her own imaging tests.

CMS “recognizes three primary levels of physician supervision” for outpatient diagnostic services:

  • General supervision. Here, the medical procedure should be under the doctor’s control and direction. The doctor who orders the test is responsible for maintaining the testing equipment and training staff on how to perform the tests. The physician does not need to be in the room during the procedure.
  • Direct supervision. The term “direct supervision” “varies according to the precise location at which the service is provided:”
    • In the doctor’s office. Here, the supervising doctor must be physically in the office suite and readily available to provide aid and direction throughout the procedure.
    • Hospital outpatient diagnostic services at an independent diagnostic facility. “The supervising physician must be present in the office suite and immediately available to furnish assistance and direction throughout the procedure’s performance.” The doctor cannot be performing another procedure that cannot be interrupted. He/she must be able to provide timely aid. There are additional rules for on-campus health providers.
    • Personal supervision. Here, the doctor must be in the room where the procedure is being performed.

The supervision requirements apply “to the technical component (the actual test administration) of a diagnostic service.” Doctors must always provide “the professional component (reading/interpreting of results) for diagnostic services.”

If the physician fails to provide the necessary level of supervision, then CMS may not find that the service is reasonable or necessary – and, thus, may not pay the claim. CMS also has diagnostic imaging requirements for determining who can order medical imaging tests and who is qualified to administer the imaging tests.

In addition to the CMS physician supervision tests, doctors may be bound by state law and the laws and regulations for their types.

Diagnostic centers and Stark Law

Physicians and diagnostic centers need to be extra careful when doctors refer their patients to a diagnostic center. It is commonplace for general practitioners and specialists to regularly recommend diagnostic centers to their patients. If, however, the doctor has a financial interest in the diagnostic center, then all sorts of red flags are raised.

Stark Law is a civil law that regulates referrals of patients who use Medicare to any designated health service (DHS) where the physician (or an immediate family member) has interest in that DHS. A diagnostic center is a designated health service. CMS prohibits the DHS from presenting claims to “Medicare (or billing another individual, entity, or third-party payer) for those referred services.”

Designated health services include:

  • Clinical laboratory services.
  • Radiology and certain other imaging services.
  • Radiation therapy services and supplies.
  • Durable medical equipment and supplies
  • Other services.

The core principle behind Stark Law is that doctors should refer patients to a DHS based on what is in the best health interests of the patient – and not what is financially beneficial to the doctor or the diagnostic center.

CMS has numerous rules about referrals to a DHS. CMS also regularly publishes an updated list of codes in the Physician Fee Schedule for a relevant DHS “because our regulations define certain DHS by CPT and HCPCS codes.”

An experienced diagnostic center lawyer can explain what services qualify as a designated health service. Some services may not be included. Stark law also provides many exceptions that have very precise definitions. Skilled healthcare lawyers help physicians, medical practices, and diagnostic centers understand when these exceptions may apply and what the requirements are. A general principle is that any financial arrangements between the physician and the DHS cannot be based on the volume, percentage, or amount of any referrals.

What Stark Law exceptions may apply to the relationship between a physician/medical practice and a diagnostic center?

Stark Law provides for different types of exceptions including ownership/investment arrangements, compensation arrangements, and exceptions involving both ownership/investment and compensation.

Several of the combination (both compensation and investment) exceptions include the following. consider for referring patients to a diagnostic center.

  • Physician services
  • In-office ancillary services
  • Preventive screening tests, immunizations, and vaccines
  • Eyeglasses and contact lenses following cataract surgery
  • Intra-family rural referrals

Compensation exceptions (for Stark Law) include:

  • Rental of office space
  • Rental of equipment
  • Bona-fide employment relationships
  • Personal service arrangements
  • Physician recruitment
  • Non-monetary compensation
  • Fair market value exception
  • Medical staff incidental benefits
  • Risk-sharing arrangements
  • Compliance training
  • Many other exceptions

The in-office ancillary services exception is often considered for heart doctors, orthopedists, and other professionals who conduct their imaging tests in their office.

Stark Law Exceptions that Might Apply to You

In today’s video, we discuss some exceptions to Stark Law, which deals with improper referrals by physicians and healthcare practitioners.


The Anti-Kickback Statute and diagnostic centers

The AKS is a federal law that imposes criminal penalties for unauthorized referrals. Illegal referrals generally include any inducement – by an entity such as a diagnostic center that is made to a physician – to include the physician to refer patients to the center. Most doctors provide a list of centers the doctors work with to their patients and let the patient choose which one the patient likes best. When diagnostic centers provide the doctor/medical practice with a benefit, the referral is tainted – because the referral is based on the financial well-being of the doctor and not by what is healthy for the patient.

Illegal inducements include financial payments, expensive meals, vacations, positions on various medical boards or organizations, and virtually anything of any value. Violations of the AKS may result in a criminal conviction, imprisonment, fines, and other consequences.

Both violators of Stark Law and the AKS may be precluded from the ability to submit any future bills to Medicare or Medicaid.

The AKS has “safe harbors” which can be implemented to help show a medical practice or diagnostic center is not in violation of the AKS. These safe harbors include many transactions and arrangements that are similar to the Stark Law exceptions. Experienced California healthcare lawyers explain how safe harbors work and when safe harbors should be considered for your medical practice.

Additional legal compliance issues for diagnostic centers?

Physicians and doctors need to be careful that the center does not order or provide tests that suggest the center is providing any medical advice or treatment. Doctors, health providers, and staff members must understand what actions may result in an unauthorized practice of medicine complaint.

HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) is a federal law that generally regulates how electronic health records are handled. Physicians regularly submit electronic requests to diagnostic centers to perform blood tests, imaging tests, and other tests. In return, the diagnostic centers regularly send the results of these tests to the physicians that ordered them. An experienced healthcare lawyer can explain when HIPAA applies and what conditions (including obtaining consent from the patient) must be met – when exchanging patient health information.

A failure to follow the strict legal compliance issues governing diagnostic centers and physician practices can result in fines, bills that will not be approved by Medicare and other healthcare agencies/entities, possible imprisonment, loss of license, and other consequences. Skilled diagnostic center compliance lawyers advise both physicians and diagnostic centers about Stark Law, the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), state anti-referral laws, Medicare requirements, the unauthorized practice of medicine, the corporate practice of medicine, the (HIPAA), the Medicare Anti-Markup Rule (AMR), and other compliance issues.

Physicians and diagnostic centers should contact Cohen Healthcare Law Group, PC to discuss referral arrangement, supervision requirements, HIPAA and other testing and business relationship laws. Our experienced healthcare attorneys help a broad range of healthcare providers and services.

Contact our healthcare law and FDA attorneys for legal advice relevant to your healthcare venture.

Categories: Healthcare

Related People

Related Services

  • Posts
  • About
  • Subscribe

Firm Highlights

  • Blog Posts
    Powering the Future Maximizing Energy Storage Value with David Braun
    In this episode of the MSSIA Insight Podcast, host Matthew Karmel, Chair of Offit Kurman’s Environmental & Sustainability Practice, sits down with David Braun, Chief Commercial Officer at Intelligent Generation, to explore how distributed energy storage is creating new opportunities for businesses, developers, and the broader energy grid.With more than 35 years of experience in the energy and utility sector, David shares how battery storage can help commercial and industrial customers earn revenue, reduce energy costs, and improve power reliability. The conversation explores revenue stacking, including how batteries can generate value through wholesale energy markets, reduce capacity and transmission charges, store excess solar energy, and provide backup power during outages or disruptions.Matthew and David also discuss the evolving energy storage landscape across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, highlighting differences in state policies, utility programs, and opportunities for virtual power plants. David explains how industry collaboration through MSSIA can help advance effective energy policies and accelerate project development.Looking ahead, David shares his perspective on the future of distributed energy storage, the transition toward a more interconnected and resilient grid, and the importance of accurately modeling battery economics to demonstrate project value and support investment decisions. In this episode, you’ll learn about: How battery storage can help businesses earn revenue, save money, and protect operations. What revenue stacking means and how multiple battery applications create economic value. How rising capacity and transmission charges are influencing energy storage opportunities in PJM. The differences in energy storage policies and incentives across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware. The role of virtual power plants in supporting grid reliability and managing energy demand. Why accurate financial modeling, customer load profiles, and utility rate structures are critical to evaluating battery projects. How MSSIA supports industry collaboration and policy advocacy across the Mid-Atlantic. Whether you're a solar or storage developer, investor, contractor, attorney, or clean energy professional, this episode offers practical insights into the economics, policy considerations, and emerging opportunities shaping the distributed energy storage market. About the MSSIA Insight Podcast Powered by Offit Kurman and presented in partnership with the Mid-Atlantic Solar & Storage Industries Association (MSSIA), the MSSIA Insight Podcast explores the legal, regulatory, and business developments shaping the solar and energy storage industries across New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware. Hosted by Matthew Karmel, the podcast features conversations with industry leaders and subject matter experts, delivering actionable insights to help clean energy professionals navigate an evolving industry. New episodes are released every other month.   Join our next policy committee call as a guest to see firsthand the impact we're driving: https://forms.gle/8WqmDvdJUKBh35Qw7
  • Events
    AIA Tri-State Conference
    Princeton will serve as the backdrop for three days of connection, learning, and design leadership. From keynotes to tours to the Tri-State Design Awards, this year’s conference is designed to go far beyond education sessions. Kick off the week with pre-conference intensives and individual state component Design Award celebrations, followed by three days of education, inspiration, networking, and design excellence at the 2026 AIA Tri-State Conference—featuring pre-conference intensives, three keynote speakers, 25 education sessions, curated tours, an expo, spec academies, and the AIA Tri-State Design Awards—bringing together architects and design professionals from New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania to connect, learn, and celebrate the best of the profession. G2. Designing Secure Practices: Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, Contractual Provisions, and Insurance Risks for Architects (4:00 PM - 5:30 PM) Architects and design professionals increasingly rely on cloud platforms, BIM software, and digital tools to manage sensitive data, creating cybersecurity and privacy risks. A single incident can trigger liability claims, regulatory obligations, reputational harm, and insurance challenges. Yet many firms underestimate how contracts, insurance, and internal practices intersect during a breach. This program offers legal and insurance perspectives on cyber risk in architecture, examining liability exposure, risky contract provisions, and mitigation strategies. A cyber insurance expert will explain policy responses, coverage gaps, coordination with professional liability, and best practices for aligning insurance with contractual risk and protecting firms from evolving cyber threats. Learning Objectives: Identify key cybersecurity and data privacy risks faced by architecture firms and explain how these risks can impact professional liability and project outcomes. Analyze common contractual provisions to determine which clauses may increase exposure to cyber incidents and propose strategies to mitigate these risks. Evaluate the scope and limitations of cyber insurance policies, including coordination with professional liability coverage, to determine how a policy would respond in a breach scenario. Develop actionable risk management strategies by integrating legal, contractual, and insurance considerations to protect sensitive client and project data.
  • Events
    The 2026 Economic, Tax, and Accounting Updates
    We are looking forward to the Mid-Atlantic CFO Roundtable's next event on November 13, 2026. This is a program with topics built for Finance Executives. We are extremely fortunate to have three excellent speakers: Dr. Daraius Irani, Vice President of Business and Public Engagement at Towson University; Mike Stankus, Tax Office Managing Principal at BDO; and Daniel Wahlberg, Managing Partner of Acclare Solutions. The economy is rapidly changing with various factors driving it. The November 3rd midterm elections may also have an impact. Our three expert presenters will discuss the ramifications of the election, and the current year updates to GAAP financial reporting and Federal and State income taxes. Please join us for what will surely be an informative and timely discussion. Meet Our Speakers: Daraius Irani, Ph.D. • Towson University Vice President, Business & Public Engagement Dr. Daraius Irani serves as Vice President of Business and Public Engagement at Towson University as well as the chief economist for the Regional Economic Studies Institute (RESI) at Towson University, a policy group providing economic, fiscal impact, and policy analysis to public and private entities.  Dr. Irani is often called upon to provide economic presentations to organizations across Maryland. He has appeared on numerous television programs and in local and regional print media. Dr. Irani holds a Ph.D. in economics from University of California, Santa Barbara. Dan Wahlberg • Acclare Solutions Managing Partner With over 28 years of experience, Dan Wahlberg is a recognized leader in audit and assurance for the Mid-Atlantic’s middle market business community. As a licensed CPA in Maryland and Virginia, Dan has led assurance practices at top regional firms, including serving as Baltimore Audit Managing Partner and Assurance Practice Leader at BDO USA in Baltimore and as Partner and member of the Management Committee at Hertzbach & Company P.A which merged into BDO in 2020. His expertise centers on delivering clarity, strategic guidance, and proactive solutions to middle-market businesses across Baltimore and beyond. His entrepreneurial spirit has led him to begin a new CPA firm this year with four other CPAs serving the business community. Dan holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Rutgers University and began his career at PWC in New York. He is also deeply engaged in the community, previously serving as President of ACG Maryland and current Board member and as Audit Committee Member for The Associated: Jewish Federation of Baltimore.  Mike Stankus • BDO USA LLP Tax Office Managing Principal Mike Stankus is the Tax Office Managing Principal for the firm’s Baltimore office. He has more than 16 years of experience providing tax planning and preparation and management advisory services for his clients. Mike focuses on advising privately held businesses and their owners on effective growth and tax strategies. He also performs various engagements for mergers and acquisitions and complex cost accounting projects and projections. In addition, he represents various government contracting clients before the DCAA and assists with FAR compliance. Mike’s areas of concentration include working with government contractors, professional service firms, construction companies, and homebuilders.