Marquee Background
Marquee Background

Offit Kurman Blogs

Family Law

When “I Do” Turns Into “You Owe”

April 21, 2026

By Stephanie Lehman

When “I Do” Turns Into “You Owe”

Marriage is a partnership — but under the Internal Revenue Code, it is also a financial alliance with serious consequences. Only spouses can file a joint tax return under I.R.C. § 6013(a). And when they do, they are jointly and severally liable for the full tax bill. Not half; not a proportional share; but the whole thing. If taxes aren’t paid, the IRS can track down or sue either spouse for 100% of the debt. For many couples, filing jointly offers lower taxes. But when a return has errors, omissions, or unpaid balances, a joint filing can suddenly become a source of unintentional, and profoundly unfair, exposure. Innocent Spouse Relief enables a “requesting spouse” to obtain relief from tax obligations that rightfully belong to the other spouse. I.R.C. has three pathways for relief. § 6015: (i) Traditional Relief; (ii) Separation-of-Liability Relief; and (iii) Equitable Relief. With each of these paths, however, there is a threshold rule: there must be a joint return.

Traditional Relief

Traditional relief is appropriate when a joint return includes an understated tax liability resulting from errors made by the other spouse’s unreported income received or improper deductions or credits claimed. In the real world, scenarios can be shockingly audacious: the deduction of business expenses never paid; nondeductible state fines disguised as business write-offs; and personal pet costs described as “home office security.”  To be eligible, the requesting spouse must demonstrate that they didn’t know and had no reason to know about the understatement when they signed the return and that it would be inequitable to hold them responsible for 50% of the liability. Traditional relief is an issue for the spouse who legally signed the return in good faith and did not know the numbers were erroneous. The alleged innocent spouse running around using the other spouse’s corporate credit card to pay for household groceries, children’s clothing, and private school tuition can claim to be “innocent.”  The request for Traditional relief typically must be made within two years of the IRS beginning collection activity.

Separation-of-Liability Relief

Separation-of-Liability Relief can be used by spouses whose marriage is ending or has ended. For this relief, a spouse wishing to claim is required to be divorced, legally separated, or widowed; have lived apart from the other spouse for at least 12 months before filing the request. The timing for relief under Separation-of-Liability Relief matters, too. The election must be made within two years of the start of collection activity by the IRS. The IRS can use Separation-of-Liability Relief to appropriately and equitably allocate the deficiency between the spouses based on who was responsible for its occurrence.

Equitable Relief

Sometimes, a spouse doesn’t qualify neatly under the technical rules of Traditional or Separation-of-Liability Relief. Equitable relief is available for hard, more human situations where the rules lack the flexibility to capture unfairness. To be eligible, the requesting spouse needs to have filed a joint return, be ineligible under the other two provisions, file a timely claim (generally within the 10-year collection period), not been involved in fraud, and not engaged in fraudulent asset transfers.

Equitable relief exists even if a piece of liability is technically attributable to the requesting spouse, especially in situations involving abuse, financial control, or coercion. The IRS assesses all facts and circumstances, no single factor prevails.

  • Marital status
  • Economic hardship
  • Knowledge or reason to know the tax would not be paid
  • Legal obligations in a divorce decree
  • Whether the requesting spouse significantly benefited
  • Subsequent tax compliance
  • Mental or physical health

In cases of abuse, especially when a spouse controlled finances or instilled fear of retaliation, the scales can tilt heavily in favor of relief.

Conclusion

A joint tax return is not a piece of paper. It’s a legal imperative with actual repercussions. It's a wise financial move to consider. For some, it becomes an unpredictable liability tied to acts they didn't take in the first place and sometimes didn't even know were possible. Innocent Spouse Relief is there to correct that. It understands that fairness is important. And under good circumstances, it offers a powerful remedy for those who signed in trust but were stuck with the bill. Marriage can be shared, but injustice does not have to be.

Categories: Family Law

Related People

Related Services

  • Posts
  • About
  • Subscribe

Firm Highlights

  • Events
    AIA Tri-State Conference
    Princeton will serve as the backdrop for three days of connection, learning, and design leadership. From keynotes to tours to the Tri-State Design Awards, this year’s conference is designed to go far beyond education sessions. Kick off the week with pre-conference intensives and individual state component Design Award celebrations, followed by three days of education, inspiration, networking, and design excellence at the 2026 AIA Tri-State Conference—featuring pre-conference intensives, three keynote speakers, 25 education sessions, curated tours, an expo, spec academies, and the AIA Tri-State Design Awards—bringing together architects and design professionals from New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania to connect, learn, and celebrate the best of the profession. G2. Designing Secure Practices: Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, Contractual Provisions, and Insurance Risks for Architects (4:00 PM - 5:30 PM) Architects and design professionals increasingly rely on cloud platforms, BIM software, and digital tools to manage sensitive data, creating cybersecurity and privacy risks. A single incident can trigger liability claims, regulatory obligations, reputational harm, and insurance challenges. Yet many firms underestimate how contracts, insurance, and internal practices intersect during a breach. This program offers legal and insurance perspectives on cyber risk in architecture, examining liability exposure, risky contract provisions, and mitigation strategies. A cyber insurance expert will explain policy responses, coverage gaps, coordination with professional liability, and best practices for aligning insurance with contractual risk and protecting firms from evolving cyber threats. Learning Objectives: Identify key cybersecurity and data privacy risks faced by architecture firms and explain how these risks can impact professional liability and project outcomes. Analyze common contractual provisions to determine which clauses may increase exposure to cyber incidents and propose strategies to mitigate these risks. Evaluate the scope and limitations of cyber insurance policies, including coordination with professional liability coverage, to determine how a policy would respond in a breach scenario. Develop actionable risk management strategies by integrating legal, contractual, and insurance considerations to protect sensitive client and project data.
  • Blog Posts
    Offit Kurman Represents 1Aardvark in Acquisition by CesiumAstro
    Offit Kurman is pleased to announce its representation of 1Aardvark, LLC, a Virginia-based company specializing in mission software, advanced algorithms, and systems engineering solutions supporting national defense programs, in its acquisition by CesiumAstro Inc., a global leader in advanced space communications and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) systems. The transaction was announced on August 18, 2026. The acquisition brings together 1Aardvark's deep expertise in mission-critical software and engineering with CesiumAstro's pioneering capabilities in space communications and ISR technologies. According to CesiumAstro, the transaction enhances its ability to deliver autonomous and resilient space systems for demanding operational environments. Offit Kurman advised 1Aardvark throughout the transaction, providing strategic legal counsel on corporate, transactional, and related matters to support the successful completion of the acquisition. Those participating in the engagement included Ryan Alexander, Gary Brackett, Robin Gilden, Pavan Mehrotra, Jim Arico and Scott Tippett. “This transaction represents a significant milestone for 1Aardvark and our team. We are deeply grateful to Ryan Alexander and the professionals at Offit Kurman for their outstanding guidance and steadfast support throughout the acquisition process,” said Ryan Kenward, President of 1Aardvark.  “Their insight, judgment, and dedication to achieving our objectives played a critical role in bringing this transaction to a successful close. We thank them for being trusted advisors every step of the way.” The acquisition underscores continued investment and consolidation within the aerospace, defense technology, and national security sectors, where software-driven capabilities and resilient space infrastructure remain increasingly important. About 1Aardvark 1Aardvark is a Virginia-based engineering and technology company specializing in mission software, algorithms, and systems engineering solutions supporting national defense missions.