Construction

A Primer on Mechanics’ Lien Claim Waivers in Pennsylvania

February 25, 2026

By Jeffrey Bright

A Primer on Mechanics’ Lien Claim Waivers in Pennsylvania

Waiver of mechanics’ lien claims is an important and frequent issue on construction projects. There are various approaches to lien claim waivers, depending on the type of project and the preferences of the parties. Because of the various types of lien claim waivers, there is often confusion. This article explains the different types of lien claim waivers.

An initial fundamental point regarding mechanics’ lien claims and waivers, is that they are creatures of statute. Each state has its own laws that govern mechanics’ liens and waivers. There is no universal, national law that governs. Instead, each state has its own statutes and interpretation of the law. Additionally, mechanics’ liens generally cannot be asserted against public projects.

Advance Lien Claim Waiver Versus Progress or Final Lien Claim Waiver

One categorical distinction between lien claim waivers is whether they apply in advance of the work, versus lien claim waivers that are executed during the progress of the project and apply to work performed as of the date of the waiver. An “advance” lien claim waiver is executed prior to the work being performed. Accordingly, it waives lien claim rights before doing the work. Most states prohibit advance lien claim waivers. In Pennsylvania, however, advance lien claim waivers are enforceable, but only on specific types of projects, and only if specific requirements are met (more on that below).

In contrast, a progress or final lien claim waiver is executed during the project, or after the work is completed, and it typically clarifies that it applies to the work already performed. The standard approach is to identify a “through date,” which means that the waiver applies to all work performed “through” a certain date. Typically, the “through date” would be a prior date that has already passed, and the lien claim waiver states that it is effective to waive lien claim rights for all work performed up to and including that date. Typically, progress lien claim waivers are executed with each payment application. None of the “through dates” are future dates—which would instead be an advance lien claim waiver. Progress and final lien claim waivers are effective and enforceable.

In Pennsylvania, for advance lien claim waivers to be effective, it must be a commercial project (non-residential), and a payment bond must be posted that covers the project. Also, the advance lien claim waiver is only effective to waive downstream (subcontractor/supplier) lien claim rights. The prime contractor with a direct contract with the owner cannot waive lien claim rights in advance, and the payment bond is posted by the prime contractor (so the payment bond does not cover the prime contractor’s demands for payment).

Conditional Versus Unconditional Lien Claim Waivers

Another categorical distinction in lien claim waivers is “conditional” versus “unconditional.”  A conditional lien claim waiver identifies that it is only effective if certain conditions (typically pending payment) occur. Thus, for example, with a conditional lien waiver, it will expressly state that the waiver is “conditioned” on the future receipt of the identified payment. If the identified payment is not received, then, the waiver (even if executed) is unenforceable.

Unconditional lien claim waivers, on the other hand, expressly state that the payment has already been received, and that there are no other requirements or events to occur for the lien claim waiver to be effective. Typically, these lien claim waivers identify themselves with the words “unconditional,” and they often state that the payment identified has been “received in fact,” or “received in hand.”  Complications can arise when payment has not in fact already been received; yet, an unconditional lien claim waiver (stating that payment has already been received) is erroneous executed. Generally, it is fair and reasonable to insist that lien claim waivers accurately express whether the payment has in fact already been made, or whether a conditional lien claim waiver should be used instead, because the payment is pending and not yet received.

It is also appropriate to revise or annotate a lien claim waiver to expressly state that certain claims, disputed amounts, open change orders, etc., are preserved and not waived. This avoids confusion on whether the payment was intended to cover any disputed, open, or unresolved items.

Preliminary Notices of Lien Rights, Construction Notices Directory, and Other Requirements

Lien claim waivers are specific documents that address whether a lien claim has been waived or preserved. Different and separate from lien claim waivers are statutory requirements that must be satisfied in order to preserve or pursue lien claims. Most states, including Pennsylvania, have requirements to notice and enforce lien claims. If you fail to satisfy all the requirements, including timeliness, it is likely that your lien claim will be lost.

Pennsylvania, similar to most states, has certain requirements that must be fulfilled when pursuing lien claims. In Pennsylvania, certain projects may be eligible for registration on the Construction Notices Directory, which is maintained by the Department of General Services. If a project is registered, then, the requirements under the mechanics’ lien law that pertain to the Construction Notices Directory must be followed; otherwise, the lien claim may be lost. One such requirement is to provide (and file with the Directory) early notice of potential lien claim rights.

Additionally, in pursuing a lien claim, certain processes must be followed; otherwise, the lien claim may be lost. In Pennsylvania, as a general rule, if the claim is by a subcontractor or anyone who is not in direct contract with the property owner, then, the claimant must give advance notice to the property owner of the intent to file the lien claim.

Also, any claimant, whether a downstream subcontractor/supplier or the prime contractor must meet specific deadlines in pursuing the lien claim. And the substance of any notices or lien claim filings must fulfill the statutory requirements. Failure to timely notice or file any of the items, or failure to adhere to the substantive requirements, will often result in the lien claim being unenforceable.

These requirements for noticing and pursuing the lien claim are not technically “waivers,” of the lien claim, but failure to follow the rules may result in the same outcome—the lien claim being lost and unenforceable.


This article also appears in the February 2026 edition of the Spokesman, a publication of ABC Keystone.

Categories: Construction

Related People

  • Overview
  • People
  • Construction Law Blog
  • Publications & News

Firm Highlights

  • Events
    RE+ Mid-Atlantic Opportunities: Market Trends and Business Development Tips
    RE+ Mid-Atlantic is where developers, financiers, investors, project buyers, utilities, and technology providers come together to evaluate opportunities, advance transactions, and build relationships that move clean energy projects forward. Whether you're looking to secure financing, identify partners, position projects for sale, or expand your network, the conversations you have at RE+ Mid-Atlantic can have a lasting impact on your business. Join this exclusive webinar, hosted by Offit | Kurman, to preview key topics that will be explored during the event and learn practical strategies for preparing for productive business conversations. By the end of this webinar, attendees will be better equipped to: Discuss emerging trends and opportunities in the regional solar and storage landscape. Learn how to communicate project readiness, regulatory strategy, and development milestones to build investor and buyer confidence. Understand strategies for reducing perceived project risk and strengthening financing conversations. Maximize meetings and networking opportunities at RE+ Mid-Atlantic to advance partnerships, financing, and project sale discussions. Whether you're a developer, investor, project buyer, or business development professional, this webinar will help you arrive at RE+ Mid-Atlantic with the knowledge, messaging, and strategy needed to turn conference conversations into meaningful business opportunities. Speakers: Lindsay Cherry  Director of Regulatory, NineDot Energy Lindsay Cherry is the Director of Regulatory Affairs at NineDot Energy, where she leads efforts at the intersection of clean energy policy, regulation, and distributed energy development. With a background in energy policy and public affairs, Lindsay works closely with regulators, policymakers, and industry stakeholders to advance innovative energy solutions and support the transition to a more resilient and sustainable power grid. She holds a master's degree from Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA). Matthew Karmel, Esq. Principal, Offit Kurman Matthew Karmel is the Practice Group Leader of Offit Kurman’s Environmental & Sustainability Law Group. He advises businesses, developers, and property owners on environmental compliance, site remediation, renewable energy, sustainability, and environmental risk management. In the renewable energy industry specifically, Matthew leads a national team that handles mergers and acquisitions, site control, land use, permitting, financing, and more.  A recognized leader in the field, Matthew, is a frequent speaker and author on environmental and sustainability issues and serves on the boards of several industry organizations, including the Mid-Atlantic Solar Storage Industries Association. David Murray Director of Business Development, Turning Point Energy David Murray is the Director of Business Development at TurningPoint Energy, where he leads business development efforts in Maryland and emerging markets. With more than 15 years of experience in clean energy and environmental policy, David has held leadership roles with the Chesapeake Solar & Storage Association and the American Clean Power Association, advancing solar energy, land use, and community engagement initiatives. He holds a B.A. in Public Policy from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an M.A. in Renewable Energy & Development from the University of Cape Town and currently serves on the boards of the Chesapeake Solar & Storage Association and Wallace Centers of Iowa. Alec Ward Senior Director of Regulatory Affairs, SEIA Alec Ward is Senior Director of Regulatory Affairs at the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), where he represents the solar and energy storage industry before federal agencies on key energy policy issues. He brings extensive experience in clean energy, regulatory affairs, and public policy, having previously led legislative and federal affairs efforts at Ava Community Energy, served at the California Public Utilities Commission, and worked on federal conservation and climate policy initiatives with The Nature Conservancy and congressional campaigns. Alec holds degrees from the University of Virginia and Johns Hopkins University and is based in Richmond, Virginia.