Blog Posts
Family Law
Protecting Your New Home During Divorce: What You Need to Know
When you are separated and going through a divorce, whether in New Jersey or almost anywhere in the United States, you need to be mindful of any assets you acquire prior to a divorce decree being signed by a judge and the entry of an accompanying Order disposing of all marital property. In New Jersey, property acquired after separation is generally considered non-marital. However, it could be considered marital if the source of funds used to acquire the real estate were marital property (i.e., saved/acquired during the marriage). For example, if you are separated and use funds from a credit union account that accrued during the marriage for a down payment, that condominium would be considered marital property and subject to equitable distribution. This means your spouse could have a claim to the condominium, and any earnings and losses from the investment may also be considered marital and subject to equitable distribution. Using the tracing method, you can determine the origination of the down payment. To safeguard a post-separation acquisition is not considered marital property, it is best to use only funds earned after separation. Alternatively, if you need to use funds that are part of the marital estate, consult with your counsel and obtain consent from the other party or the Court to use such funds as a credit against your share of equitable distribution before making the purchase. It is important to keep all documentation to trace and demonstrate the source of funds used for the purchase, thereby protecting your post-separation property from any claims by your spouse. Every case is unique. The information above is generally applicable, but it is important to consult with a seasoned family law attorney in the state in which you live. By taking these precautions, you can better safeguard your post-separation acquisitions and ensure a fair distribution of marital assets during the divorce process.
August 7, 2024
Family Law
Credit Card Chaos: Safeguarding Your Credit in Separation
Often spouses share joint credit cards during their marriage, or one spouse may be added as an authorized user on the other’s credit card. However, upon separation, one party may continue using the card, leading to significant debt accumulation. When considering divorce or separation, paying prompt special attention to the status of your credit accounts is crucial. Determine if the accounts are joint or individual. If there are any individual accounts, check if your spouse is an authorized user. Please consult an attorney about closing joint accounts or converting them to individual ones before canceling any authorized user cards. Additionally, it is essential to run a credit report to identify all accounts in your name or jointly. Often, one spouse may be unaware that their credit is linked to the other spouse’s accounts. In many divorce cases, parties and their attorneys will reach an agreement as to who is responsible for which credit card debt or arrange to pay off specific debts from marital assets before or after the finalization of the divorce. However, what if one party fails to abide by the agreement? In the case of a joint account, failure to pay by one party would adversely impact both parties’ credit scores. While the innocent spouse can bring the offending spouse back to court for violating the order, there is no court remedy to repair a credit score. Avoid leaving any loose ends in your divorce proceedings. Ensure all joint accounts are closed and paid off before the divorce is finalized or transferred into the responsible party’s name. Don’t solely rely on your spouse’s agreement to pay off the debt. Secure funds from another asset, if possible, to settle the account promptly and ensure your name is removed from the account as soon as possible. When considering divorce or separation, consult with an experienced family law attorney such as Megan Smith and Emily Ingall about closing joint accounts or converting them to individual accounts before canceling any authorized user cards. Should you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact Megan and Emily for guidance.
April 9, 2024
Family Law
New Standard for Child Relocation Applications in New Jersey
Originally posted on 4/20/2018, content updated on 10/20/2023 So you want to move to warm, sunny Florida with the kids, but your ex spouse is saying “no way”…… The Best Interests of the child In Bisbing v. Bisbing, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the outcome of a contested relocation determination must be made pursuant to the best interests of the child. This replaced the previous case law, which was heavily relied upon in Bauers v. Lewis. In all contested relocation disputes, courts should conduct a best interests analysis to determine “cause.” The best interests of the child standard is the new standard, regardless of the custody arrangement in place. In Bisbing v. Bisbing, pursuant to the terms of a Marital Settlement Agreement, the divorcing parents agreed that the Mother was the primary residential parent with custody of their twin daughters. The MSA also included a relocation provision stating that “[n]either party shall permanently relocate with the children from the State of New Jersey without the prior written consent of the other.” Shortly after the divorce, the mother informed the father that she was planning to remarry and relocate to Utah with her new husband (with whom she had a relationship prior to the Court granting the Final Judgment of Divorce). The father refused to consent to the permanent relocation of the children to Utah. The mother then filed a motion seeking an order permitting her to permanently relocate with the children to the State of Utah. The Father stated that the Mother had negotiated the MSA in bad faith, securing his consent to her designation as the Parent of Primary Residence without informing him that she relocated. Applying the standard established in Baures v. Lewis, the Trial Court granted the Mother’s application for relocation, finding she presented a good-faith reason and that the move would be in the children’s best interest. Thereafter, the Mother relocated to Utah with the children. The Father appealed the Trial Court’s decision. The New Jersey Appellate Division reversed and remanded, finding that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the Mother negotiated the custody provisions of the MSA in good faith. The Mother was then Ordered to return with the children to the State of New Jersey. The Trial Court ordered the parties to then abide by the residency provisions previously entered into in the MSA. Supreme Court finds “Special Justification” to Abandon the Baures Standard. The Supreme Court of New Jersey recognized a “special justification” to abandon the standard it had established in Bauers v. Lewis for determining the outcome of contested relocation matters. In place of the Baures standard, Courts should conduct a best interests analysis to determine “cause” under N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 in all contested relocation disputes in which the parents share legal custody. The Court remanded to the Trial Court for a Plenary Hearing to determine whether the Custody arrangement previously agreed to and as set forth in the parties’ MSA should be modified to permit the relocation of their children to Utah. No Waiver of Interstate Child Relocation The Court declined to agree with the Father’s assertion that by consenting to the Interstate relocation provision of the MSA, the Mother waived her right to a judicial determination of her relocation application under N.J.S.A. 9: 2-2. However, the Mother must demonstrate that there is “cause” for an Order authorizing relocation, which shall be determined by the best interest analysis considering the factors in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4 ( c). Notably, because the best interests standard applies to the determination of “cause” nothwithstanding the designation as the Parent of Primary Residence, the Trial Court need not decide whether the Mother negotiated the parties’ MSA in bad faith. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
October 20, 2023
Family Law
LGBT Common Law Marriage
Originally posted on 2/28/2018, no content changes Pennsylvania was one of the few states that continued to recognize common-law marriage. Although common law marriage in Pennsylvania was abolished in 2005, it continues to be recognized retroactively, meaning that a common law marriage entered into prior to 2005 is still recognized in Pennsylvania. Thus, in the event of a termination of the relationship, parties to a common law marriage may go through the divorce process and are entitled to the same rights and benefits as parties who were formally wed. In 2017, a Pennsylvania Superior Court case confirmed that same-sex couples who entered into a common law marriage prior to 2005 are also entitled to the same rights and benefits accruing as a result of the marriage. This allows same-sex couples to gain rights they would otherwise not have due to the fact that same-sex marriage was not recognized in Pennsylvania until May 20, 2014, when marriage equality was achieved. These rights and benefits include but are not limited to equitable distribution of assets, interim support during the divorce process, alimony, and social security survivor benefits. All of these rights and benefits are fact-sensitive and vary in each case, which is why it is important to seek a family law attorney to discuss whether the facts of a specific case would qualify as common law marriage and/or what rights and benefits are applicable. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith atmsmith@offitkurman.com.
October 18, 2023
Family Law
Custody and Relocation in Pennsylvania
Originally posted on 3/14/2018, no content changes Relocation with a child in Pennsylvania is a complicated issue involving whether or not the parent who is relocating has primary physical custody and whether the location of his/her new residence will impact the visitation time of the parent who has partial physical custody, or any other party having visitation with the child. The process does not revolve around which parent has legal custody but how the relocation will affect the visitation rights of the other parent (or sometimes other parties, i.e., if a grandparent had partial physical custody/visitation rights). If the parent with primary physical custody wishes to relocate with the child, he or she must provide the other parent a formal notice of relocation, which must outline detailed information regarding the relocation. Following receipt of the Notice of Relocation, the non-relocating parent has thirty (30) days to file an objection to the Notice of Relocation with the Court. If such an objection is filed, the Court will schedule a hearing to determine the merits of relocation and whether same is in the best interest of the child(ren). If no objection is filed, the relocating parent must file a request to have the Court confirm his/her relocation with the child(ren). At that hearing, the Court will likewise make a determination as to whether the relocation is in the best interest of the child(ren), however, if no objection is filed, there is a presumption that the parties’ agree to the relocation and that same is in the child(ren)’s best interest, and thus the relocation is normally granted. If you are thinking of relocating and that relocation may negatively impact the other parent’s visitation schedule, it is imperative that you seek legal advice and ensure the proper notice is given and confirmation is granted by the Court before the move. As this can be a complicated issue and every case is fact-sensitive and unique, be sure to consult with a family law attorney, and sufficient time to obtain the necessary confirmation is allotted to ensure your move goes smoothly and visitation is not disrupted. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
September 21, 2023
Family Law
Understanding the Necessity of a Pre-Nup
Originally posted on 5/21/2018, no content changes In Pennsylvania, pre-nuptial agreements meeting the statutory requirements are generally enforceable and the best way to provide peace of mind prior to a marriage. The main reasons a pre-nuptial agreement may be necessary include: Protecting existing (pre-marital) assets; Protecting against potential future support obligations (spousal support, alimony pendente lite, and alimony); Protecting business interests, most often family or closely held businesses; Protecting assets for children of a prior relationship and Estate planning. Pre-Marital Assets: Under the Pennsylvania Divorce Code, assets that are owned prior to the marriage and are maintained in separate names, continue to belong to the individual owner in the event of divorce. However, if the value of such an asset were to increase during the course of the marriage, the increase in value would be included in the marital estate and subject to equitable distribution. Protecting against the passive increase in value of pre-marital assets becoming part of the marital estate is one of the main reasons pre-nuptial agreements are recommended. Pre-nuptial agreements can also protect against active increases in value, such as ongoing contributions to a pre-marital 401(k) or payment of a mortgage on a pre-marital home. Protecting against future support obligations: Consideration must be given to whether either party may have any support obligations in the future if the parties were to divorce. With the exception of support for children, parties can agree to contract specific provisions as to spousal support, alimony pendente lite, and alimony, or may choose to specifically negate any such obligation from arising by including certain provisions regarding same in a pre-nuptial agreement. Protecting Business Interests: The division of a business or interest in a business can be an extremely litigious and costly exercise that is often required in any divorce involving a closely held or family business. Business appraisals are almost always necessary, and the obligation of one party to buy out the other party’s interest can be onerous. In cases such as these, pre-nuptial agreements can be used to protect against this kind of litigation almost as an insurance policy as the business interest and many other aspects can be exempted from the marital estate. Protecting assets for children and Estate Planning: These two aspects often go hand-in-hand. Certain assets can be exempted from a marital estate and protected for children from a prior relationship under both a will and a pre-nuptial agreement, which provides additional protection for such assets. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
September 12, 2023
Family Law
What Does "No Fault" Divorce Mean?
Originally posted on 6/01/2019, no content changes. The Pennsylvania Divorce Code provides two no-fault grounds for divorce: Divorce by Mutual Consent and a Divorce based upon a One Year Separation. In the case of a divorce by mutual consent, the parties often are able to reach an agreement and memorialize the terms in a writing known as Marital Settlement Agreement, in advance or at the same time as the Divorce Complaint is filed. Other times, parties may reach an agreement and memorialize the terms after the Divorce Complaint is filed but before the expiration of the required one-year separation. In such cases, the parties can obtain a divorce decree by mutually consenting to the divorce by filing affidavits no less than ninety (90) days from the service of the Divorce Complaint. For all other cases, to avoid the necessity of requiring parties to meet the proof requirements of the fault-related grounds for divorce, a party can move a divorce matter to conclusion through court intervention following a one-year separation. Parties can be separated and still living in the same household. Proof of separation includes termination of an intimate relationship, separation of finances and representation to the community that the parties are separated. While the service of a Complaint for Divorce is a clear threshold for establishing a date of separation, a party can attempt to establish an earlier date of separation utilizing the applicable factors. The Pennsylvania Divorce Code provides for six (6) fault-related grounds for divorce: Desertion, Adultery, Cruel and Barbarous Treatment, Bigamy, Incarceration, and Indignities. Even if a divorce complaint is filed alleging one or more of the fault-related grounds for divorce, the no-fault grounds are almost always also included in the complaint. For more information on this topic please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
September 5, 2023
Family Law
I Don't Have Many Assets...Do I Need A Pre-Nup In Pennsylvania?
Originally posted on 10/11/2019, no content changes. Regardless of a person’s current assets, a pre-nup is always prudent prior to entering into a marriage because a it can offer so many things other than just protecting the assets you have before your marriage: Pre-Marital Assets:Assets accrued prior to a marriage are largely protected from an equitable distribution (division of assets) incident to a divorce in Pennsylvania. However, the growth of those assets (i.e., increase in value) that occurs during the marriage will be considered part of the marital estate and subject to equitable distribution. Not only can a pre-nup protect the growth on the pre-marital assets during the marriage and ensure this increased value remains separate property (does not get divided incident to a divorce), but it can also take the case law and statutory protections that currently exist and extend those protections. For example, a pre-nup can extend protection in the event that a pre-marital asset is co-mingled or otherwise used for a joint purpose during the marriage. Without a pre-nup, co-mingling of a pre-marital asset often may be considered a gift to the marriage, and the pre-marital status may be lost. Assets Accrued During the Marriage: In Pennsylvania, assets and income accrued/earned during the marriage are largely considered “marital” property and thus subject to equitable distribution (division of assets incident to the divorce). A pre-nuptial agreement is able to exempt assets that may be accrued during the marriage as a party’s separate property, thereby avoiding distribution in the event of a divorce. Real Estate: Whether real estate is acquired before or during the marriage, if there is a mortgage or other maintenance/capital contributions to a home during the course of a marriage, same may give rise to a claim for equitable distribution of this asset. A pre-nup can clearly define what, if any, of a pre-marital residence or a residence purchased using pre-marital funds is or is not subject to division between parties incident to a divorce (example: pre-marital savings used for the down payment on the marital home). A pre-nup can go even further and provide one party the option to purchase the other party’s interest in real estate in the event of a divorce as well as a clause for vacatur of a home following a specified event (i.e., notice of wish for divorce or receipt of the filed Divorce Complaint). A pre-nup can even go so far as to address how bills will be paid and each party’s obligation to contribute, including addressing issues of unemployment, staying home with children, among other possibilities. Retirement Assets: Due to the fact that retirement assets are subject to equitable distribution, this is yet another reason for a pre-nup. If you are a saver and your significant other is not, do you want to give him/her half of your retirement savings in ten (10) years if your marriage ends? Whether retirement savings are accrued before or during a marriage, a pre-nup can address how such assets should be divided, as well as the growth on those accounts during the marriage. Gifts and Inheritances: Similar to pre-marital assets, gifts and inheritances by one party/spouse are largely protected from equitable distribution, however, a pre-nup can provide additional protections, including protection in the event of passive growth and co-mingling. Protections in the Event of Death: A pre-nup can provide protection of assets and elective share rights in the event of death. This allows you to leave your assets to whomever you wish (children, other family members, etc.) and prevents your spouse from taking against your estate under intestacy or elective share unless you specifically leave asset(s) to him/her under a will. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith atmsmith@offitkurman.com.
August 31, 2023
Family Law
Divorce in New Jersey - Gathering Data
Originally posted on 2/21/2019, no content changes. Information is power. In order to be in a position to deal with issues in your divorce case, you must have information concerning assets, debts, income and expenses. No agreement or settlement can be considered fair unless you have full knowledge of the marital finances. Toward that end, you should begin gathering information on income, expenses, an itemization of all accounts, pension information, employment benefits, insurance information and all other financially relevant information at the outset of your case. Do not assume that you know the answers. Do not trust your spouse's verbal representations. Do not be overly suspicious or distrustful. In virtually every case, the basic information which you should begin gathering are copies of: The past three years' personal tax returns. The current year's bank statements. The current year's brokerage account statements. The current year's credit card statements. Any quicken or a similar computer software program itemizing your expenses. The last three years' year-end employment benefit statements for you and your spouse including 401(k) plans, pension, deferred stock, stock options or deferred compensation. Copies of any life insurance policies. Policy numbers, insurance company names and coverage limits for health, auto and homeowners insurance policies. In any case in which one of the spouses is self-employed, owns a small business or is a shareholder in a closely held corporation, you should also try to obtain copies of: The past three years' tax returns for the business. The past three years' financial statements for the business. Any loan applications with supporting financial statements submitted to a lender by the business. Any Buy-Sell Agreements. As you and your attorney begin to see the financial records, you should discuss with your attorney whether you need to employ a forensic accountant. If there are assets which cannot be located or easily defined, if there appears to be unreported or cash income or if there is a professional practice or business to be evaluated you will almost certainly need to engage an accountant. In some cases, we do encounter a spouse who will deliberately attempt to conceal the records, and if that happens in your case, you and your attorney must take a much more aggressive and proactive approach. For example: If you know there is cash in your home, you should take it into your possession and immediately inform your attorney. If you know there is a second set of books or business records, you should copy them, seal the copies in an envelope and mail them to your attorney. The postmark will identify the date in which you obtained and mailed the records, the integrity of them can then be protected by your attorney's office. If you begin to see mail or financial statements that are not familiar to you, make copies. If you have access to your spouse's cell phone records, make copies. Make copies of any credit card statements whether they are your accounts, your spouse's accounts or joint accounts. The more information you can gather, the better informed you and your attorney will be as you begin the formal discovery process discussed later. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
August 29, 2023
Family Law
Divorce in New Jersey - Discovery
Originally posted on 3/12/2019, no content changes. Discovery is a variety of processes which are designed to accomplish exactly what the word implies: to discover additional information or factual data. The scope of discovery is very broad. Simply stated, the rule is that you can ask for everything which is relevant “or may lead to relevant information.” There are various types of discovery. Some of the most common are: Interrogatories - Interrogatories are written questions which you submit to your spouse, which must be answered in writing and under oath. There is a tendency to ask broad, all-encompassing questions in order to avoid the risk that something may be overlooked. However, many times, such an approach to discovery is ineffective and unproductive. On the contrary, carefully phrased, very specific questions are more likely to produce specific responses which will be helpful to you and your attorney. Notice to Produce Documents - Notice to Produce Documents requires your spouse to produce any documents which are relevant to the case and which are either in their possession or subject to their control, such as employment records, bank or brokerage accounts which are in their name, or pension and IRA account statements. Oral Depositions - In some states, this proceeding is called an Examination Before Trial. That is exactly what it is. It is your attorney’s opportunity to examine or to take testimony from your spouse or any other witness before trial. They are placed under oath so that all of their answers are “sworn testimony.” The proceeding is in the presence of a Court Reporter who records the questions and answers verbatim. The questions and answers of your spouse are evidential and can be submitted directly into evidence at the time of trial. For other witnesses, they can be very valuable tools to confront and contradict statements made at the time of trial. Appraisals - Appraisals are regularly conducted to determine or verify the value of a specific asset for the purpose of dividing the same incident to equitable distribution. Experts are retained and utilized for this purpose. Assets that are often subject to appraisal incident to a divorce include real estate, businesses, pensions, jewelry, artwork, and vehicles. Very often, clients are concerned that their spouse will not respond to interrogatories or notices to produce and/or will stall, delay or refuse to appear for an oral deposition. Those are understandable but not reasonable concerns. The Court will enforce reasonable discovery requests and will be very impatient with a party who has frustrated or unreasonably delayed discovery. The Court may: Limit or bar a person’s trial testimony if they have not cooperated with discovery; Assess counsel fees against the offending party; or In some instances, impose monetary sanctions and penalties against the offending party. Remember, on the other hand, that Discovery is a “two-way street.” While you have every right to require your spouse to participate in Discovery, you, correspondingly, have the obligation to respond to reasonable requests from your spouse. If properly conducted, Discovery will provide both parties with an information base to allow them to negotiate fairly and enter into a Settlement Agreement. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
August 25, 2023
Family Law
Divorce in New Jersey - Filing a Complaint
Originally posted on 2/21/2019, no content changes. Oftentimes, it is difficult to get a client to file the Complaint for Divorce. They may be reluctant to do so for religious or moral reasons or sometimes because they simply do not want to be the person who initiated the divorce. On the other hand, some clients want to prematurely file the Complaint out of anger of resentment. Try to avoid making the decision for such reasons. Discuss with your attorney whether there are any legal issues which may affect the timing of the divorce filing. Sometimes, there are medical insurance issues, sometimes there are pending changes regarding your assets, or sometimes there are significant pending changes in your income of employment status. Any of those could significantly affect the decision as to whether or not a Complaint for Divorce should or should not be filed. Absent such legal considerations, is usually does not make any difference who files first or on what grounds. As to the grounds for divorce, New Jersey has “no fault grounds." Irreconcilable differences is now the most often used no-fault ground. However, notwithstanding the ease of using such ground, you should review with your attorney whether or not a fault ground should be used. In some cases, the fault may be so egregious or may have such a significant impact on the family finances that it should be used. For examples, a history of violence, substance abuse or alcoholism may be very important with regard to parenting issues. Or, a long history of infidelity, particularly when family income or resources have been squandered on extramarital affairs, may be relevant as to how the remaining assets should be distributed. Or, fault which involves or affects the children may be relevant to custody issues. When considering a fault ground, however, a word of caution is appropriate. You should not be over zealous. For examples, you may not want to call instances of marital infidelity with a subordinate to the attention of your spouse’s employer if to do so may result in them losing their job. Similarly, unnecessarily or inappropriately disclosing unreported income may result in IRS liens or penalties, which could be minimized of avoided with a more reasoned approach. If the disclosure of such matters is important to your case, your attorney can discuss with you the use of arbitration or another alternative dispute resolution. The date of the filing of your complaint for divorce is an important date. It will serve as the baseline or starting point for the determination of your financial status relative to your divorce. Therefore, discuss it carefully with your attorney. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
August 22, 2023
Family Law
Divorce in New Jersey: Custody
Originally posted on 2/26/2019, no content changes. There are cases in which one of the parents has abandoned their parental responsibilities, suffers from addictions, suffers from a significant mental or emotional condition, or is otherwise unfit to assume either physical or legal custody. In such cases, the specific facts must be carefully analyzed. In such circumstances, one party may have limited parental rights, supervised visitation may be required, or a "Parenting Coordinator" may be utilized. Supervised visitation means that a person cannot be in the presence of their child without appropriate adult supervision. A Parenting Coordinator is utilized to facilitate decision-making when the parents are incapable of doing so themselves. These alternatives should only be used if and when absolutely necessary and only as a last resort. Absent such extenuating circumstances, New Jersey law regarding custody of children can be summarized in the simple principle that the parenting arrangement must be in "the best interest of the child." Notice that the operative words are in the best interest of the child, not necessarily in the best interest of either or both parents. Whatever the parenting arrangement, it must address two basic areas of responsibility: physical and legal custody. Physical custody determines where the child will reside, how many days with each parent and at what times: weekdays, weekends, holidays and vacation periods. Legal custody involves decision-making regarding the child. Decisions such as elective medical care, religious training, schooling decisions and extra-curricular activities are the typical discretionary decisions which are a part of legal custody. In order to determine what parenting arrangement is "in the best interest of the children," the Court must apply specific statutory criteria. Those criteria include: a parent's ability to agree, communicate and cooperate in matters relating to the child; a parent's willingness to accept custody of the child; any unwillingness on the part of either party to allow visitation or contact with the child with the other parent; the relationship of the child with the parent; any history of domestic violence; the safety of the child; the preference of the child when the child is of sufficient age so as to form an intelligent decision; the needs of the child; the stability of the home environments of the respective parents; the quality and continuity of the child's education; the fitness of the parent; the geographic proximity of the parent's home; the extent and quality of time that each parent spent with the child either prior to or subsequent to this separation of the parties; each parent's employment responsibilities; the age and number of children. In most cases, the primary objective should be to maintain a continuing relationship between each parent and the child. The Court will attempt to craft a physical custody arrangement whereby each of the parents will enjoy meaningful parenting time with the child at regular intervals and a legal custody, which allows both of them to participate in the decision making responsibility for the child. There are many books discussing the impact of divorce upon children, and the theories espoused in such books are as numerous as the books themselves. However, there is one common theme in almost all of the reliable literature: the greater the conflict between the parents, the more the negative impact of the divorce will be upon the child. Psychological studies show that there are certain types of parental behavior which almost always adversely affect children. Such behavior should be recognized by both parents, and each should avoid falling into such behavioral patterns regardless of their reason for doing so. Such behaviors include: Denigrating or criticizing of your spouse in the presence of your children; Seeking to make your child your ally or confidant; Involving your child in discussions regarding your divorce; Blaming your spouse for your own shortcomings. If you are unhappy, frustrated or depressed, seek competent psychological counseling; do not tell your child that you would be fine if it were not for your spouse or your spouse's conduct; Engaging in verbal confrontation with your spouse in the presence of your children; Any physical confrontation in the presence of the children; Using your child as a messenger between you and your spouse. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
August 17, 2023
Family Law
Divorce in New Jersey- Alimony
Originally posted on 2/26/2019, no content changes. Alimony is financial support paid by one spouse to the other. Alimony is in addition to child support and is not related to the needs of the child or the child's emancipation. It is support paid by one spouse to the other solely for the support of the recipient spouse regardless of the needs or status of the children. There are very important differences between alimony and child support, not only in terms of a person's initial entitlement but with regard to the duration, the ability to modify the amount, and the termination of the payments. However, one of the most important distinctions is that child support is not tax deductible by the person making the payments, nor is it considered taxable income to the person who is receiving the payments. Alimony, on the other hand, is tax deductible to the payor and is considered taxable income to the recipient. There are several types of alimony in New Jersey: Reimbursement Alimony is seldom used but is designed to reimburse one of the spouses for their "investment" in the other spouse's career or earning capacity. It is designed to address the situation in which one of the spouses contributed to the college or graduate school expenses of the other, and the marriage terminates before the financial benefits of the enhanced education can be realized. The intent is to repay the person for their contributions to the other party's education or career training. Rehabilitative Alimony is alimony that is designed to enable the recipient to "rehabilitate" their career. If, for example, one of the spouses has interrupted their career to be a stay-at-home parent and now needs additional education, recertification or licensing in order to return to their employment, rehabilitative alimony may be appropriate to sustain their living expenses or to cover their educational expenses until they are able to return to their prior career. Limited Duration Alimony is alimony which is paid for a defined period of time and applies to marriages of 20 years or less. In order to award Limited Duration Alimony, the Court must make a finding that permanent alimony is not warranted because of the length of the marriage, the parties' incomes, or other factors. After reaching the conclusion that Open Durational Alimony is not warranted, the Court may then award Limited Duration Alimony in a specific amount for a designated length of time. Once awarded, the length of the term itself may not be extended, although the amount may be modified. Open Durational Alimony is payable until the death of either party, the re-marriage of the recipient, the cohabitation of the recipient with an unrelated third party or a "substantial change of circumstances" which would warrant a modification of either the amount or a termination of payment entirely, such as good faith retirement at the appropriate age. Other instances of "substantial change of circumstances" may include a significant increase in a party's income, a significant decrease in a party's income, or a medical condition. In determining both the type and amount of alimony, the Court must consider specific factors, including: the needs of the recipient and/or payor; the ability of the payor to make the payments; the duration of the marriage; the parties' age; the parties' physical and emotional health; the standard of living established during the marriage; the earning capacity, the educational levels and employability of each of the parties; the length of absence from the job market of the recipient party; each party's parental responsibilities for the unemancipated children; the time and expense necessary to acquire sufficient training or education in order to return to the employment market; the history of financial or non-financial contributions to the marriage by each party; the amount of equitable distribution by either party and, specifically, the income which such equitable distribution may generate to each of the parties; an unearned or investment income; the tax consequences of the alimony. It is often said that both the recipient and the payor of the alimony should be able to enjoy the "standard of living which was established and maintained during the marriage." However, that concept is much more of a guidepost than an attainable reality in most cases. In all but an extraordinarily high income family, it is simply impossible for both parties to maintain the same standard of living that was enjoyed by them during the marriage. In the vast majority of cases, both parties will have to compromise their marital lifestyle. It is simply arithmetically impossible to divide the post-divorce income into two family units and have each of the units equal the prior single family unit lifestyle. There are very important principles of law which address the situation in which a payor's income increases after the divorce. The application of those principles requires an in depth review by a competent Divorce Attorney. However, the general concept is that the recipient of alimony is only entitled to enjoy the lifestyle and thus receive alimony based upon the payor's income during the marriage and at the time of the divorce. They are not entitled to share income increases, which occur after the dissolution of the marital partnership and without contribution or support from the recipient spouse. On the other hand, if the parties' financial circumstances at the time of the divorce do not enable the recipient spouse to be supported at the standard of living which was enjoyed during the marriage, and the payor's post-divorce income rises to a level that then enables a payment which would maintain the marital standard, a post-divorce increase in the amount of alimony may be warranted. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
August 15, 2023
Family Law
Divorce in New Jersey - Pretrial Motions and Applications
Originally posted on 2/26/2019, no content changes. Only one to two percent of all divorces go to trial and will ultimately be decided by a Judge. The other ninety-eight percent will be resolved by agreement of the parties as a result of some pretrial procedure or by mediation, arbitration or settled as the trial is about to begin. Therefore, more attention should be directed to pretrial proceedings and much less to the unlikely eventuality of a trial. Pretrial applications to the Court are extremely important and useful. We are often asked what can be submitted and determined by the Court on a pretrial application. The easy (and generally very accurate) answer is virtually anything. Common subjects which are submitted to the Court on pretrial applications are: A temporary support or alimony arrangement. A temporary custody or parenting plan arrangement. The allocation and payment of marital bills and expenses. An advance of counsel fees or litigation expenses. The maintenance of insurance coverage. In addition to this practical scope of pretrial applications, there are a number of applications which your attorney may want to make. For example: To obtain additional documents or information which your spouse is not voluntarily producing. To gain access to real estate or a business for the purpose of appraising it. For the appointment of an independent appraiser. For the production of medical or hospital records when appropriate and relevant. For custody or parenting evaluations As your case continues, there may be more sophisticated, evidential or technical reasons for pretrial applications. For example, your attorney may want to make an application to: Bar your spouse's testimony or production of evidence on matters for which they have not produced discovery. To limit or eliminate certain issues, such as whether or not pre-owned or inherited assets should be included or excluded from equitable distribution. To predetermine evidential issues which may be important to either your side or the other side's presentation of the case. For tactical reasons, your attorney may also want to file a pretrial application to begin to "set the tone" for the case. If your spouse has been uncooperative in discovery and necessitated an unnecessary expenditure of attorney or accountant's fees, your attorney may want to begin to relay that to the Court in support of an ultimate application for an advance of attorney's fees. If, by way of further example, your spouse is interfering with or failing to appear for parenting time, your attorney may want to call that to the attention of the Court because of the impact it will have on the ultimate custody determination. In summary, more time and effort should be expended by you and your attorney on pretrial matters and much less time on trial strategy or preparation if you are interested in an expedient and successful resolution of your case. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
August 10, 2023
Family Law
Divorce in New Jersey – ESP, Mediation and Arbitration
Originally posted on 3/15/2019, no content changes Alternative dispute procedures can be very effective in settling your case before trial, which should be every divorce litigant's goal. Trials take a very long time to be scheduled, are often not completed in consecutive days, usually require several days of testimony over several months, are typically extremely expensive, and are almost always used to further polarize the parties. Given that only two percent of all divorce cases are actually decided by trial, every litigant must ask themselves why their case is so different from the rest that it should be included within the two percent of cases that go to trial. There are a variety of alternatives that can be utilized to aid in settlement negotiations or pretrial settlement of a case. In New Jersey, the court mandates the attendance of the Matrimonial Early Settlement Panel (MESP). Matrimonial Early Settlement Panels exist in every County and are free to the litigants. The panels are staffed by two experienced divorce attorneys who volunteer their time for this purpose. The parties, through their attorneys, provide written submissions to the panelists, who then make recommendations as to the proper disposition of the case. If a case does not settle after going to MESP, several counties in New Jersey have Mandatory Economic Meditation, where you must meet with a court-approved mediator to further attempt to settle your case. In addition to the court-mandated Matrimonial Early Settlement Panel proceedings and Mandatory Economic Mediation, the parties themselves always have the right to access private mediation or arbitration. In private mediation, the parties and their attorneys will mutually agree upon an experienced mediator, who then meets with them in an effort to mediate a settlement of the issues which are in dispute. The mediator does not make a decision and, in most instances, does not even render a recommendation. The mediator's function is, generally, to stimulate discussion between the parties and to assist them in coming to a mutually agreed upon settlement. Arbitration, on the other hand, is a decision-making and binding proceeding. There are a number of experienced divorce attorneys and retired Judges who are willing to serve as arbitrators. The parties and their attorneys generally enter into an Arbitration Agreement, which will define the nature and scope of the arbitration. The parties may agree that the arbitration will be conducted on a very formal, Court-like basis or in a very informal proceeding. With very limited exceptions, the arbitrator's decision is then binding. In every case, you, as the client, should understand these alternatives and should review and discuss them with your attorney. Depending upon the facts and issues in your case, one or the other of these alternatives may be a very desirable alternative. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
August 8, 2023
Family Law
Protecting your Home with a Pre-Nuptial Agreement
It is increasingly more common for at least one person in a couple to have purchased his or her home prior to the parties’ marriage. Often, such a purchase occurs years in advance of the parties even meeting each other. In cases such as these, a pre-nuptial agreement is necessary to preserve that person’s home in the event of a divorce. Assuming the parties move into the pre-marital home of one of them, many issues, including the payment of bills, payment of the mortgage, increase in the value of the home and exclusion of a party in the event of separation or divorce, should all be considerations in a discussion of protecting this asset. Under the Pennsylvania Divorce Code, passive and active increases in the value of pre-marital assets, such as a pre-maritally owned residence, become part of the marital estate. Passive increases mean increases in value due to the passage of time such that the fair market value of the home has risen through the course of a marriage. Active increases include payments to a mortgage or home improvements. Active and/or passive increases can be discussed and potentially exempted from the marital estate through the use of a pre-marital agreement, thus protecting them from equitable distribution or claims of the other party in the event of a divorce. Likewise, in the event of a divorce in Pennsylvania, a pre-nuptial agreement can define a date certain by which a party must vacate a residence, thereby providing the other exclusive possession. Without such a provision or current agreement otherwise, parties are left to make an application for such relief from the Court, and there is no guarantee such a request will be granted during the pendency of the divorce process, which often may take more than a year. Bill payment and maintenance of the household is another issue that can be addressed by a pre-nuptial agreement (and if the parties are not contemplating marriage in the near future, a cohabitation agreement). For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
August 7, 2023
Family Law
Top 10 Divorce Mistakes to Avoid
Divorce can be an unpleasant and stressful process. Parties who have not educated themselves or who proceed without the guidance of an experienced divorce attorney often make mistakes that can last a lifetime and are typically more expensive in the long run. Don’t be one of them. Here are 10 of the most common mistakes to avoid during a divorce: 1) Involving the kids in the process If your case involves a custody or parenting time dispute, nothing will anger a judge more than involving the children in the dispute. One rule is straightforward: leave the kids out of it. Do not talk to the kids about your case. Do not use them as pawns in your “battle” against your spouse. Do not put your spouse down in front of the children. Do not “coach” your children as to what they should say if they have to meet with a custody evaluator, a doctor, a therapist, or a judge. By doing so, you are not only harming your case; you are harming your children. Even after the divorce is over (and it will be over), the children will still have (and need) both of their parents — always place the children first. 2) Taking advice from friends, family, or the internet Everyone always hears about a friend’s cousin who took the other spouse “for everything they had” and advises that you should demand nothing less. This free advice is worth exactly what you paid for it – nothing. Each case will be resolved based on the unique facts and circumstances of that case. What one person is awarded is often very different from what another person has been awarded. While friends and family are a great source of emotional support, they are not legal professionals. 3) Letting your emotions get the best of you Frustration, despair, and sadness are just a few of the many intense emotions that can be at play during the divorce process. Seeing things clearly can often be hard when such heavy emotions cloud your judgment. Take a moment to do what is necessary to regain a logical, calm, and clear perspective. Take the time to acknowledge your feelings and practice self-care to regulate your emotions. Don’t make hasty decisions based on heightened emotions. Having the assistance of an experienced divorce attorney is critical to ensure you are acting with your head, not just your heart. A skilled therapist can be hugely helpful as well. 4) Hiding or failing to produce documents You have an absolute right to see your spouse’s financial documentation. Your spouse has a fundamental right to see your financial documentation. The court will order you both to produce your financial documentation to each other. If you fail to do so promptly, it will only cost you more money and time down the road. More importantly, if you fail to disclose certain accounts or statements, any agreement you reach could become void, and it is highly likely that a court will impose extreme sanctions on the offending party. A full and complete disclosure will ensure that you are aware of the assets and liabilities subject to distribution and that you are receiving a fair division of same in your divorce. 5) Lying to your attorney Your attorney is there to help you. They are there to fight for you and ensure you get the best possible resolution of your case. Your communications with them are privileged – meaning they cannot (with a few exceptions) disclose what you tell them without your permission. The more your attorney knows, the more (and the better) your attorney can help you. No matter how embarrassing, outrageous, or ugly, an experienced divorce attorney has likely heard it all before. You need to keep your attorney fully informed and prepared to confront and manage any issues that arise in your matter. 6) Failing to identify separate property While most of the assets you and your spouse acquired during your marriage are subject to distribution in your divorce, most of the assets you acquired before your marriage are not. Under New Jersey State law, generally speaking, “separate property” is defined as property acquired by an individual prior to marriage, and “marital property,” in the absence of a prenuptial agreement, is defined as property acquired by one or both spouses during the marriage, irrespective of whose name the asset is in. It is important that you identify to your attorney any assets you acquired before the marriage and any potential commingling of that asset into a marital asset so that your attorney can protect your separate assets for equitable distribution. 7) Making oral agreements Even if you and your spouse continue to have an amicable relationship after separation and throughout the divorce process, do not make the mistake of entering into side oral agreements with your spouse concerning issues in your divorce. Memorializing all agreements in your written settlement agreement is essential to protect your interests. It is often very difficult, if not impossible, to enforce oral side agreements, especially if your written agreement purports to incorporate the entire agreement. 8) Failing to consider post-divorce finances Once you separate, the economic realities of having two separate households can be stressful. Not only are there two sets of expenses for two different households, but you are also transitioning from a two-income household to a one-income household. After separating, you should prepare a financial plan or budget for your new financial circumstances. It would be best to refrain from creating new or additional debts. Finally, do not assume that debts from your marriage are paid. If you and your spouse jointly accumulated debts during the marriage, ensure that you advise your attorney of those debts and have an agreement in writing as to which party is responsible for the payments of these debts during the pendency of the divorce. Upon finalization of your divorce, ensure that your settlement agreement explicitly sets out who is responsible for paying back that debt and remove your name from any liabilities that you are not responsible for, such as mortgages or credit cards. This will ensure that you are not held liable for debts you do not incur or are unaware of. 9) Being your own attorney Many couples believe it is unnecessary to hire attorneys to aid them in the divorce process, or they believe one attorney can represent the interest of both parties. However, an attorney (unless you go through the mediation process) only represents one individual and is there to protect only that individual’s interest. Both parties should retain their own independent counsel to represent their respective interests. Failing to hire an attorney may lead you to enter into a disadvantageous agreement. Note that a mediator cannot represent either party and can be hired as a neutral to assist you and your spouse negotiate an agreement. 10) Having unrealistic expectations In order to reach an equitable agreement and resolution of your matter, both parties must often modify their expectations. Most divorces require some give and take, and your attorney will work with you to create a strategy to obtain the things most important to you. Going through each of the issues in your divorce and deciding which ones are worth the time, energy, and expense of litigation and/or negotiations is the best way to utilize your resources and save money on your divorce.
August 4, 2023
Family Law
Divorce in New Jersey - Child Support
Originally posted on 8/11/2019, no content changes. Child support is primarily dependent upon the levels of the parent's income. In those cases in which the parents' combined income is less than $187,200 per year (net of taxes), the Child Support Guidelines will be the baseline determination of the amount of child support. A determination must first be made as to which of the parents is the Parent of Primary Residence and which parent is the Parent of Alternate Residence. The parent with the most overnight time with the child is the Parent of Primary Residence and, thus, the parent to whom the child support is paid. Then, if the parents' combined after-tax income is less than $187,200, the amount of child support to be paid is presumptively defined by the New Jersey Child Support Guidelines and is subject to basically only three variables : The number of overnights per week which the child spends in each parent's home; The total income of the parties; Each party's respective share of the total income. The computer programs which apply the Guidelines automatically take these variables into account. Although the amount calculated under the Guidelines is only presumptive as to the appropriate amount of child support, that presumption will be accepted in the vast majority of cases. In addition to the basic child support, there are certain "extraordinary" expenses most often allocated between the parents in the ratio of their incomes. Typically, such "extraordinary" expenses include, but are not limited to, medical expenses or work-related daycare expenses. In addition to medical and daycare expenses, individual cases and a child's particular needs or interests may justify additional payments. For example, does the child have a learning disability or other educational deficit which may require specialized schooling or tutoring? Does a child have specific musical, athletic or other talents which have been nurtured or supported by the parents through individual lessons, training, coaching or camps? In those cases in which the parents' combined income exceeds $240,000 per year net of taxes, the Court must consider specific factors in order to determine the amount of child support. The factors include: needs of the child; the standard of living and economic circumstances of each parent; all sources of income for each parent; the assets of each parent, or the earning ability of each parent; the child's need and capacity for further education, including higher education; the age and health of the child; the age and health of each parent, and the income or assets of the child, and the responsibility of either parent for other Court ordered support; the reasonable debts of either party. The determination of the child support for such "above guidelines" cases is complicated and somewhat subjective. "Above Guideline" child support requires a complete analysis of the child's needs and the standard of living during the marriage. It should only be done with the advice of a competent attorney. In every case, the parties should also attempt to define when the child will be "emancipated" (meaning that the child support will terminate) and if either party will be required to contribute to the child's college or other educational expenses. For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
August 4, 2023
Family Law
Divorce in New Jersey: Trial
Originally posted on 3/15/2019, no content changes. If you and your spouse have been unable to settle your case between yourselves and none of the settlement alternatives described previously have been successful, it may be necessary to prepare and submit your case for trial before a Judge. The trial of a case has been described by some as being analogous to an iceberg. The tip (or, in this case, the trial itself) is a very, very small portion of the overall process. The remaining 90% is below the surface and is often not seen. A trial involves tedious and time-consuming preparation of witnesses, the preparation of exhibits, marking of evidence and Subpoenaing of witnesses. If your case is going to trial, be absolutely certain that you have reserved enough time from your personal and work schedule to meet with your attorney to prepare the case. Similarly, be certain that your attorney has scheduled adequate time to meet with you, prepare your testimony, be certain that you have all of the evidence and exhibits and that you have a full understanding of the trial process. Any documents which are not current must be updated. Any documents which are not official or certified copies must be replaced by official or certified documents which can be properly moved into evidence. Any witnesses who are going to be utilized must be interviewed and prepared. Any documents or evidence which they will rely upon in their testimony must be organized. Very often, it is extremely important to develop charts or graphs showing the flow of funds into or out of accounts, fluctuations in income, or even simply plotting the growth or loss in value of various assets. There is no such thing as over-preparing for trial. On the other hand, many trials are lost by a lack of preparation. Once the trial begins, there is an orderly, defined and rigid process which is followed. Each attorney will give their opening statements to the Court. In the opening statement, they will outline the case and outline for the Court what they intend to prove and how they intend to prove it. Each witness will then be called to the witness stand and subjected to a direct examination. Every point must be made by asking a question and getting a specific answer. It is a tedious and detailed process. No witness can simply give a long narrative to the Judge. That narrative must be broken down into specific questions with specific answers. At the conclusion of direct examination, every witness will be subject to cross-examination by the opposing attorney. Cross-examination is designed to show conflicts in the testimony, to show a bias or lack of credibility in the witness and to generally undermine the witness's testimony or credibility. Cross-examination is not a pleasant process, and you should be sure that your attorney has fully and adequately prepared you for a cross-examination by subjecting you to a mock cross examination prior to the trial. Remember that when submitting evidence to the Court, your attorney is bound by the Rules of Evidence. Things which are hearsay, which are not within the first-hand knowledge of witness or otherwise do not comply with the Rules of Evidence, are of no value at the time of trial. At the conclusion of the trial, your attorney will submit a lengthy and usually written closing argument and summation to the Court. This document will outline and summarize what has been presented into evidence, what conclusions we want the Court to draw from the evidence and citations to the law which support such conclusions. Following the Judge's decision, either you or your spouse will have the right to appeal. However, the appeal of the case is not simply a "second bite of the apple." There are very limited and narrow grounds for an appeal. You must show that the Judge's findings were not only in error but were "arbitrary and capricious" or that the Judge erred in the interpretation or application of the law. Trials are difficult and expensive and should be considered only when absolutely necessary. There are, however, cases in which the issues are so significant or complex that they can only be resolved by a trial. If that is your case, prepare, prepare, prepare and then prepare some more! For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
August 1, 2023
Family Law
College Decision Day – Now, Who Pays?
May 1 is an important and exciting day for high school seniors around the country, as this day is known as National College Decision Day. On May 1 each year, high school seniors are required to have made their formal commitment to the university they intend to attend by accepting their offers of admission and placing their college deposits. While some states have laws that grant courts the authority to order a non-custodial parent to contribute to a child’s college expenses, New Jersey does not have this requirement. Instead, New Jersey law grants the court the discretion to require that divorced or separated parents both contribute to a child’s college education and related expenses. In Newburgh v. Arrigo, 88 N.J. 529 (1982), the Supreme Court of New Jersey set forth several factors to consider in determining parents’ college contributions. These factors include: whether the parent, if still living with the child, would have contributed toward the costs of the requested higher education; the effect of the background, values, and goals of the parent on the reasonableness of the expectation of the child for higher education; the amount of the contribution sought by the child for the cost of higher education; the ability of the parent to pay that cost; the relationship of the requested contribution to the kind of school or course of study sought by the child; the financial resources of both parents; the commitment to and aptitude of the child for the requested education; the financial resources of the child, including assets owned individually or held in custodianship or trust; the ability of the child to earn income during the school year or on vacation; the availability of financial aid in the form of college grants and loans; the child’s relationship to the paying parent, including mutual affection and shared goals as well as responsiveness to parental advice and guidance; and the relationship of the education requested to any prior training and to the overall long-range goals of the child. Id. at 545. Subsequent case law in New Jersey has narrowed the obligation for contribution to a period in which there is an affirmative request and subsequent agreement or Order directing each party’s contribution. See Gac v. Gac, 186 N.J. 535 (2006). If you are looking to require your ex-spouse/partner to contribute to your child’s college contribution, here are some tips to consider to help achieve a favorable outcome: Assist your child in first obtaining all available loans, scholarships, grants, and aid. Keep the other parent informed of what schools the child is considering, the tuition costs, etc. If the two of you do not reach an agreement as to how the costs will be paid by May or June immediately preceding the child’s metrication to university, you should make the appropriate application to the court to avoid application of Gac. We strongly recommend that you consult with a knowledgeable family law attorney licensed in New Jersey regarding the facts and nuances of your matter, as all cases are fact sensitive and specific to the family involved. If you would like to discuss this issue or any other with us, please contact us by email at Emily.Ingall@offitkurman.com and msmith@offitkurman.com or by phone at 929-476-0046 or 267-338-1378.
May 10, 2023
Family Law
Divorce in New Jersey- Equitable Distribution
Originally posted on 3/12/2019, no content changes. Equitable distribution is the division of the marital assets and liabilities between the parties. The equitable distribution of the marital assets and liabilities is fundamentally a three-step process. The assets and liabilities acquired during the marriage must be identified. The assets and liabilities must be evaluated either by review of the account statements or other documentation, the use of appraisers or the utilization of a forensic accountant, and The method and respective percentages of the distribution must be determined. Unlike several other states (most notably California), New Jersey is not a community property state. In community property states, the assets and liabilities are divided equally regardless of any other circumstances. New Jersey is an "equitable distribution" state, meaning that the assets and liabilities acquired during the marriage must be "fairly" distributed between the parties. What is "equitable" under the facts and circumstances of a particular case is not simply a subjective determination of fairness or equity. If it were, almost every person would argue that "equitable" means that they should receive a higher percentage of the assets. They would argue that because of their perceptions as to why the marriage ended, their perceptions as to their work efforts during the marriage and their general sense of "being victimized" justifies them receiving a higher percentage of the assets. Those perceptions are, however, largely irrelevant, and the specific statutory factors which must be considered are: the duration of the marriage; the age of the parties; the physical and emotional health of the parties; any income or property brought into the marriage by each of the parties; the standard of living established during the marriage; any written agreements made by the parties either before or during the marriage; the economic circumstances of each party at the time the division of the property becomes effective; the income and earning capacity of each party; each party's educational background, training and employment skills, work experience, absence from the job market; parties' respective custodial responsibilities for the children of the marriage; the contribution of each party to the education training and development of the earning power of the other party; each party's contribution to the acquisition or dissipation of the martial assets, including:the other parties' contribution as a home maker; the tax consequences of the proposed distribution; the value of the property or asset; the need of the parent who has physical custody of a child to own or occupy the marital residence; the debts and liabilities; the need to create a trust or other fund for foreseeable medical educational expenses; and the extent to which either party deferred achieving their career goals. You should familiarize yourself with each of these factors. If there are facts or circumstances in your case which you feel relate to any of the factors, you must call them to the attention of your Attorney. As your case progresses, your position with regard to the distribution of the assets must focus upon an analysis of these factors, not your own feelings as to what is "equitable." If your case is ultimately decided by a Judge, the Judge's decision will include a specific analysis of each factor and its relevancy to the facts of your case. Therefore, in order to have some projection as to what a Judge may decide, you must analyze your case in the context of these factors. It is also important to consider that not all assets must be divided in the same percentages. It is entirely possible that some of the assets in a case could be divided equally while others, because of the relevancy of any one or more of these factors, may be distributed other than equally. For example, it is not unusual that the value of a small business or professional practice may not be divided equally between the parties. The person operating the business or professionally engaging in the practice may receive a higher percentage of the value. In some instances, the person with specific needs for certain assets, such as the household furnishings to maintain a home for the children, may receive all or substantially all of the household furnishings. Thus, it is not only important that all of the marital assets and liabilities be considered but that each asset be individually analyzed. There are also assets which may not be subject to equitable distribution and will be retained by one of the parties. Assets which are received by one of the parties by way of a gift from a third party, inherited assets or assets which are owned prior to the marriage may remain the property of the person who received, inherited or owned the assets prior to the marriage. If there are such assets, the question then becomes whether any increase in their value during the marriage is distributable. If the increase in value is solely as a result of increased market conditions or inflation, it usually will not be subject to equitable distribution. If the increase in value is the result of the efforts of one or both of the parties, it generally will be subject to equitable distribution. For example, if one of the parties owned a home at the time of the marriage and that home was renovated or improved by the parties' work efforts and/or financial investment during the marriage, the increase in value resulting from those improvements may be subject to marital distribution. If, on the other hand, the pre-owned asset was a bank account which increased in value solely as a result of interest on the account, the increase in value may not be subject to equitable distribution. If an inherited, gifted or prior owned asset is placed into joint names, sold or transferred into another asset, which is then placed in joint names, it may lose its status as an exempt asset and be converted into an asset subject to marital distribution. It is impossible to discuss all of the alternatives which may exist regarding prior owned, gifted or inherited assets in a particular case, but the point to emphasize is that you must inform your Attorney that such assets exist so as to allow them to analyze the particular circumstances surrounding those assets, and advise you as to what if any part of the value of that asset may be exempt from or included in the marital distribution. In terms of valuing the assets, some assets are very simple to value, others much more complex and the majority somewhere in between. Bank accounts, stock brokerage accounts, 401(k) accounts, or other accounts are easily valued by simply obtaining the most recent account statement. Small businesses and professional practices are very complex and difficult to evaluate. Their value can only be determined through the opinion of a competent forensic accountant who will examine the financial statements, income tax returns and nature of the business or practice and can then provide an expert opinion as to its value. Many assets may not be as simple as account statements nor as complex as small businesses but may, nonetheless, require the use of an expert or competent appraiser to determine their value. For example, a competent appraiser may have to be engaged to render an opinion as to the value of a home. Actuaries or pension experts may be engaged to offer similar opinions as to the value of pension or retirement accounts, and sometimes there are collectibles, art objects or other personal property of sufficient value to warrant retaining an appraiser as to their value. Again, it is impossible to discuss all of the alternatives as to the valuation of assets which may be subject to equitable distribution. What is, however, important is to know that you have the right to see the account statements or to obtain other competent expert opinion as to the value of the assets, and you should never settle a case without at least a reasonable level of due diligence to document and determine the value of the assets being distributed For more information on this topic, please contact Megan Smith at msmith@offitkurman.com.
August 3, 2019
