Family Law

Cohabitation Agreements: Protecting Assets and Income of Unmarried Couples Residing Together in DC

December 21, 2023

By Marshall Yaap

Unmarried couples residing together in the District of Columbia would be wise to execute a cohabitation agreement defining their rights and responsibilities to avoid substantial financial risk.

The District of Columbia is one of a small number of jurisdictions in the United States that recognize “common-law marriage.”

Contrary to popular belief, there is no minimum amount of time that couples must live together to form a common-law marriage. Instead, a couple forms a common-law marriage in the District of Columbia when there is cohabitation following an express mutual agreement, which must be in words of the present tense, to be permanent partners with the same degree of commitment as the spouses in a ceremonial marriage. A common-law marriage can be formed without any marriage ceremony or marriage license.

A well-drafted cohabitation agreement signed and notarized by both parties will unequivocally explain that the parties do not intend to form a common-law marriage. The agreement should also clarify that each party will retain their own assets and income and assume responsibility for their own debt if and when the relationship ends.

In the absence of a cohabitation agreement, one of the parties to the relationship might file a complaint for divorce in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, asserting that the parties formed a common-law marriage. If the Court concludes that the parties formed a common-law marriage, the Court can order one party to pay spousal support to the other, depending upon the facts of the case. The Court can also equitably distribute property and debt acquired by the parties from the date of marriage to the date of divorce, except property acquired by gift or inheritance, and order one party to reimburse the other party for attorneys’ fees incurred in the divorce proceeding.

Even if the parties never formed a common-law marriage, the party who denies the existence of a common-law marriage will have to engage in lengthy and costly litigation to prove that the parties were never common-law married to avoid having his or her assets and income divided by the Court.  The attorneys’ fees involved in defending against a false common-law marriage claim can be substantial.

To avoid costly and time-consuming litigation and protect your income and assets, anyone planning to reside with another person in a romantic relationship or already residing with another person in a romantic relationship should promptly seek the assistance of an attorney in preparing a cohabitation agreement.

Categories: Family Law

Related People

Related Services

  • Overview
  • People
  • Family Law Blog
  • Publications & News
  • Events

Firm Highlights

  • Events
    AIA Tri-State Conference
    Princeton will serve as the backdrop for three days of connection, learning, and design leadership. From keynotes to tours to the Tri-State Design Awards, this year’s conference is designed to go far beyond education sessions. Kick off the week with pre-conference intensives and individual state component Design Award celebrations, followed by three days of education, inspiration, networking, and design excellence at the 2026 AIA Tri-State Conference—featuring pre-conference intensives, three keynote speakers, 25 education sessions, curated tours, an expo, spec academies, and the AIA Tri-State Design Awards—bringing together architects and design professionals from New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania to connect, learn, and celebrate the best of the profession. G2. Designing Secure Practices: Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, Contractual Provisions, and Insurance Risks for Architects (4:00 PM - 5:30 PM) Architects and design professionals increasingly rely on cloud platforms, BIM software, and digital tools to manage sensitive data, creating cybersecurity and privacy risks. A single incident can trigger liability claims, regulatory obligations, reputational harm, and insurance challenges. Yet many firms underestimate how contracts, insurance, and internal practices intersect during a breach. This program offers legal and insurance perspectives on cyber risk in architecture, examining liability exposure, risky contract provisions, and mitigation strategies. A cyber insurance expert will explain policy responses, coverage gaps, coordination with professional liability, and best practices for aligning insurance with contractual risk and protecting firms from evolving cyber threats. Learning Objectives: Identify key cybersecurity and data privacy risks faced by architecture firms and explain how these risks can impact professional liability and project outcomes. Analyze common contractual provisions to determine which clauses may increase exposure to cyber incidents and propose strategies to mitigate these risks. Evaluate the scope and limitations of cyber insurance policies, including coordination with professional liability coverage, to determine how a policy would respond in a breach scenario. Develop actionable risk management strategies by integrating legal, contractual, and insurance considerations to protect sensitive client and project data.