Legal Blog

Why Targeted Marketing In Housing Is Not A Good Idea


Understandably, every landlord wants to maximize marketing efforts to find as many qualified tenants as possible. The most desired way to accomplish this goal is to collect demographic information from prospects who visit and show interest in their properties so that they can later directly advertise to that same demographic.  In other words: if most of the people who show interest in a property are young adults without children, it may be tempting to directly target marketing towards similarly situated young adults without children.  While, on the surface, this marketing plan may seem reasonable, harmless, and fail proof, it is a bad idea and could result in liability for landlords.

Under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), it is unlawful to discriminate against anyone based on their membership in a protected class. Under federal law, the protected classes are: race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, and national origin.  Various states have included additional protected classes, such as age, sexual orientation, veteran status, and personal appearance (to name a few).

Contrary to popular belief, targeted marketing may be discriminatory under the FHA because it is unlawful to make, print, or publish any notice, statement, or advertisement that indicates any preference, limitation, or discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, national origin, or any other protected class. The law also prohibits the selective use of advertisements, such as strategically placing billboards or distributing brochures within limited geographic areas, and advertising in mediums known to reach a very particular demographic of the community.

Practically speaking, if a landlord is collecting or making note of its tenants’ protected class demographics (e.g., familial status— “50% of our prospective tenants are young adults without children!”) to tailor its advertising efforts (e.g., “we need to market to all young adults without children!”), the landlord’s actions would likely run afoul of fair housing laws and, to their further detriment, they are creating a clear record of their illegal collection efforts for anyone who may later investigate.  When certain types of fair housing complaints are filed against a landlord, fair housing investigators often inquire about whether the landlord collects and/or keeps records of demographic information of prospects and residents. When a landlord can answer “no,” this greatly reduces the appearance of impropriety.

If a landlord wants to target market, the law does provide for a few exceptions. Namely, it is legally permissible to directly advertise the availability of accessible housing and advertise housing intended and operated for occupancy by older persons. Also, if the property receives state or federal housing funding, the landlord may be required to complete an affirmative fair housing marketing plan, in which a landlord could obtain approval to target certain demographics which are least likely to apply for housing at the property.  However, if none of these exceptions apply, proceed with caution.

For additional information about fair housing laws impacting landlords, please contact me, Revée M. Walters, at rwalters@offitkurman.com or 240-507-1768.

ABOUT REVÉE WALTERS

rwalters@offitkurman.com | 240-507-1768.

Revée M. Walters is an attorney in the Commercial Litigation and Landlord Representation practice groups, and is a member of Offit Kurman’s Diversity Committee. She represents small and large companies in a wide variety of industries in state and federal court litigation, mediations, arbitrations, and agency proceedings. A focus of her practice is on the representation of clients in diverse and complex housing and employment law matters. This representation includes drafting commercial and residential leases, management agreements and partnership agreements related to real estate; advising and representing clients in cases involving public accommodation, the Fair Housing Act and Americans with Disabilities Act, breaches of lease, wrongful detainer and tenant holdover; and advising clients on employment issues, including compliance with federal and state employment laws, discipline and discharge decisions, handbook and policy development, and medical leave and disability issues. In addition, Revée also handles cases involving breaches of contract, securities fraud, insurance coverage disputes and shareholder disputes.

 

ABOUT OFFIT KURMAN

Offit Kurman is one of the fastest-growing, full-service law firms in the Mid-Atlantic region. With over 150 attorneys offering a comprehensive range of services in virtually every legal category, the firm is well positioned to meet the needs of dynamic businesses and the people who own and operate them. Our eleven offices serve individual and corporate clients in the Virginia, Washington, DC, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York City regions. At Offit Kurman, we are our clients’ most trusted legal advisors, professionals who help maximize and protect business value and personal wealth. In every interaction, we consistently maintain our clients’ confidence by remaining focused on furthering their objectives and achieving their goals in an efficient manner. Trust, knowledge, confidence—in a partner, that’s perfect.

You can connect with Offit Kurman via our Blog, Facebook, Twitter, Google+, YouTube, and LinkedIn pages. You can also sign up to receive Law Matters, Offit Kurman’s monthly newsletter covering a diverse selection of legal and corporate thought leadership content.

MARYLAND | PENNSYLVANIA | VIRGINIA| NEW JERSEY | NEW YORK | DELAWARE | WASHINGTON, DC