Having listened to a vast majority of the PHH hearing, the main focus was the issue of constitutionality. Specifically, whether the director of the CFPB’s for cause termination requirement is an unconstitutional delegation of presidential power.
It was clear that a couple of justices sided with PHH, however there were more pro CFPB structure judges overall. The main issue on one side for PHH comes down to the power of the CFPB and the limited aspect to which it can be controlled. In particular, the fact that PHH argued that giving one person the power over the CFPB, protected for a five-year term, with limited oversight vested too much power outside of elected hands. PHH argued that if such a pattern were repeated for multiple agencies, the President would basically become a meaningless puppet figure.
The counter argument is that there are boards for other agencies that the President doesn’t control, with he or she being able to appoint two or three members. The counter argument therefore is that the President’s power is already being diffused by existing agencies.
It does seem as though the CFPB has become more confident in sticking around in their current capacity. For the considerable future, it doesn’t appear anything drastic will be changing. So for now, business can be conducted as usual provided you’re taking all the proper precautions in adherence to regulations.
Questions about the PHH vs. CFPB structures? Contact Ari Karen at firstname.lastname@example.org or
ABOUT ARI KAREN
Ari Karen is an experienced litigator and speaker who has focused his practice in representing financial institutions in both government investigations and litigation before state and federal trial and appellate courts nationwide.
Mr. Karen’s practice is diverse, representing clients on matters concerning banking regulations, Dodd Frank financial reform laws, contractual disputes, employment and labor statutes, wage-hour class actions, employment discrimination and fair lending matters, whistleblower complaints and non-competition claims, among others.
ABOUT OFFIT KURMAN
Offit Kurman is one of the fastest-growing, full-service law firms in the Mid-Atlantic region. With over 135 attorneys offering a comprehensive range of services in virtually every legal category, the firm is well positioned to meet the needs of dynamic businesses and the people who own and operate them. Our eleven offices serve individual and corporate clients in the Virginia, Washington, DC, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York City. At Offit Kurman, we are our clients’ most trusted legal advisors, professionals who help maximize and protect business value and personal wealth. In every interaction, we consistently maintain our clients’ confidence by remaining focused on furthering their objectives and achieving their goals in an efficient manner. Trust, knowledge, confidence—in a partner, that’s perfect.
You can connect with Offit Kurman via our Blog, Facebook, Twitter, Google+, YouTube, and LinkedIn pages. You can also sign up to receive Law Matters, Offit Kurman’s monthly newsletter covering a diverse selection of legal and corporate thought leadership content.
MARYLAND | PENNSYLVANIA | VIRGINIA| NEW JERSEY | NEW YORK | DELAWARE | WASHINGTON, DC